- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
RKO said:I can almost guarentee you that WWE has a part in TNA already. Ask yourself this question. What happens to all the "free agents" in the WWE? If they are not generating enough popularity, WWE will send them to TNA. Ask yourself this question as well. What free agents havn't went to TNA yet? (Angle, Hardy, Melina, Mickie <3, Gail Kim... they all have) All their contracts expired, so they all went to TNA.
Now ask yourself this question as well; Why would Cena threaten Vince with going to TNA, right before Vince was about to fire Cena, but Triple H came out and relieved Vince.
Is this all making sense now?
As far as, "Will it ever get bigger then the WWE"? No. Not even close... Ever.
Sage said:18-35 is the most popular age-group for WWE fans at the moment.
WWE wouldn't ever sell to Panda Energy, lol.
CM PuLs3 said:Well, if you go bankrupt, you kinda have to. Thats how much money and dependance they are putting into WWE Network succeeding.
Crayo said:I'm not sure WWE would put themselves in that position, which is completely unneeded. If it does fail, they'd have a backup plan installed with plenty of money left behind I think. Vince failed with the XFL too remember.
Crayo said:I understand the network completely, I'm also convinced it'll be a success. It's a risk, but it's a worth-while risk. They're not stupid enough not to have a backup plan. Why would you put your billion dollar business in a situation like that, when it's completely not needed? They're just doing it to continue promoting the brand, if it fails, they'll be fine.