Why WWE badly needs C M Punk after WM 29

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
Save the company from what? 3.0 ratings and 1 million + Wrestlemania buys? The company doesn't need saving and if it did Punk wouldn't be fit for the job.
 

shrayan

The Artiste
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
292
Reaction score
10
Points
0
Dolph'sZiggler said:
Save the company from what? 3.0 ratings and 1 million + Wrestlemania buys? The company doesn't need saving and if it did Punk wouldn't be fit for the job.
i'm not saying that wm 29 was a failure in terms of ticket sales or that monday night raw need to be saved. Look at wm 29:80000+ attendance . Are you kiddin' me! But anyway wwe will never be the show we loved to watch back in 2003-2004.At that time a wm attendance would be around 54000(wm 19). But that was the era when people and critics used to be overwhelmed every week on raw for matches like rock vs hhh. and today rock performs at wm or at selected ppv's.So if anyone can give matches like those it is surely punk(remember his match with cena on raw). Wwe needs those moments not only at wm but on raw itself. And now it's all up to punk to bring it.That's why punk's that guy.