Why weren't some scenes filmed differently?

[Grievous 3D]

Never said you should abandon narrative and continuity logic.

Good...

Just said don't worry about how the non existent science behind the functions of a lightsaber...cuz its a stupid kids Sci-Fi movie.

So...according to you Star Wars is a "Stupid Kids Science Fiction movie"

Right?

Putting words in my mouth.

I'd never put anything in your mouth...trust me.

 

[Redboy123@]

I'd never put anything in your mouth...trust me.

Yeah you did. You said that I liked something when I don't...

So...according to you Star Wars is a "Stupid Kids Science Fiction movie"

Right?

Yh its called an opinion

 

[Grievous 3D]

Yeah you did. You said that I liked something when I don't...

Yeah...its annoying that isn't it?

Yh its called an opinion

Thank you Captain Obvious...

 

[Redboy123@]

Yeah...its annoying that isn't it?

In different circumstances it may, but since we are talking about fucking Star Wars lol I don't really care tbh.

Thank you Captain Obvious...

Don't ask an obvious question, without expecting an obvious answer.

 

[Paul Diaz-Berrio]

Because that knowledge was not known when the original star wars movie came out. The last Rogue One scene is actually one of the first scenes shown in Episode 4 but just recreated and brought to the modern era.

Yeah, that stands to reason. They had to come up with a reason for why in the beginning of ep. 4, the rebel ship gets boarded. It's a poor one considering how quickly the star destroyer, or the V ship took to catch up with it. I guess the epic cliffhanger is Disney's recipe for a quickie ending.

And it's quite true that kids are one of the spectators, so we can't let the big bad monsters have too much of over the heroes, can we?

 

[Paul Diaz-Berrio]

Yeah, that stands to reason. They had to come up with a reason for why in the beginning of ep. 4, the rebel ship gets boarded. It's a poor one considering how quickly the star destroyer, or the V ship took to catch up with it. I guess the epic cliffhanger is Disney's recipe for a quickie ending.

And it's quite true that kids are one of the spectators, so we can't let the big bad monsters have too much of over the heroes, can we?

Duplicate quote created by mistake. Please delete.

 

[MildlyUpsetGerbil]

And it's quite true that kids are one of the spectators, so we can't let the big bad monsters have too much of over the heroes, can we?

It seems like the heroes always win regardless if the movie in question is targeted towards kids or adults. Nobody wants to sit through a movie getting attached to a character only to see that character come up short at the end of the film. Audiences generally prefer happy endings, so that's what we generally receive.

 

[Paul Diaz-Berrio]

It seems like the heroes always win regardless if the movie in question is targeted towards kids or adults. Nobody wants to sit through a movie getting attached to a character only to see that character come up short at the end of the film. Audiences generally prefer happy endings, so that's what we generally receive.

Logan (2017) changed that. John Logan died in the end and many people thought he'd have lived to fight another day. It turned out he didn't and Hugh Jackman has so far not wanted to reprise the role. So, has cinema created a divergence in the world of superheroes? Have they begun to realise how infantile always letting the good triumph over evil and live to tell the tale?

 

[The Gipper]

It seems like the heroes always win regardless if the movie in question is targeted towards kids or adults. Nobody wants to sit through a movie getting attached to a character only to see that character come up short at the end of the film. Audiences generally prefer happy endings, so that's what we generally receive.

Sup Thanos.

 

[Redboy123@]

When you do a trilogy surely the bad guys always win the second movie.

Besides loads of movies have unhappy endings.

 

[MildlyUpsetGerbil]

Logan (2017) changed that. John Logan died in the end and many people thought he'd have lived to fight another day. It turned out he didn't and Hugh Jackman has so far not wanted to reprise the role. So, has cinema created a divergence in the world of superheroes? Have they begun to realise how infantile always letting the good triumph over evil and live to tell the tale?

I'm referring to protagonists defeating their antagonist, not living through their struggle. Most movies will have the protags win.

Sup Thanos.

Sup past ten Marvel movies that ended with the heroes standing tall?

When you do a trilogy surely the bad guys always win the second movie.

Mainly to make the rubber match between the villains and heroes in the third movie more interesting.

 

[The Gipper]

Sup past ten Marvel movies that ended with the heroes standing tall?

Sup Civil War

 

[MildlyUpsetGerbil]

Sup Civil War

Still a minority.