Who will succeed more: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins or Roman Reigns?

[Testify]

Now this is a good thread, unlike Punk ones.

I voted Reigns, but Rollins is close I feel.

Ambrose... I have my doubts about him. He's awesome yes, but I think WWE isn't looking for someone like him long term.

 

[Roi]

I would Say ambrose , but just cuz I'm a mark.
Rollins have the look (sadly) and Vince is/gonna be high on him. He's like Batista .a powerhouse. I expect him to be an uppermicard . ( 2 USA , 5 IC , 2WHC)
I really like Seth , he sells really well and has a really god in ring work . He works well as face. All depends on how the WWE books him. ( 5 USA , 4 IC , 4 WHC , 2 WWE )
Ambrose , one of my favourites wrestlers right now , he has the skill and he's fresh . We need a psycho guy . He's like orton but with the mic skills. Expect him to be the most important one in WWE's future . ( 3 IC ,2 WHC ,3-4 WWE)

 

[Crayo]

Ambrose. He has it all. He has a great look and is arguably the best at portraying his gimmick -- both inside and outside the ring -- in the whole company. He is a great wrestler and an even better talker, and talking well has become more important over the years.

I nearly said Reigns solely because of his look and how Vince has a fetish for big guys. The reason I didn't is because he drastically needs to improve on the mic, and without that ability he will not go far unless WWE start to use managers effectively again.

I really fear for Rollins to be honest. I can see him being a midcarder for life with no real chances to get a main event spot. He will hop between midcard success, failure and then tag-teams, but I hope I am wrong.