First of all, she's not a semi retired mega star, so she'll definitely be full time. Secondly it's the complete opposite. Once she loses, everything they built around her character so far was completely useless and she'll be just like any other dull face on that womens division. And the only way the streak loses it's "luster" is if she's facing people we know WWE has no interest in pushing. When she faces Emma, it's pretty clear who's going over, but if you book high quality match ups like Banks vs Asuka, people will question themselves on whether WWE's willing to make her lose yet or not. Just like people did with Ember Moon.
I'm aware she's not retired. I don't believe that at all. If that were true, Brock would suck right now and literally no one would give a shit after he lost to golderbeg. It's the opposite, and Brock came out on top. Granted he's part time, but I'm speaking in terms of winning streaks.
Just imagine this exact comment on Taker's streak a decade ago. "Well, it loses its luster because we know he's gonna win at Mania". But it was probably the best thing to happen every Mania, wasn't it?
It's different when someone when's every match on raw, smackdown, PPV's vs once a year. Apples and oranges. She's already lost her luster by going this long and never losing.
1) having a streak end in a multi women match doesn't help anyone in this situation because none of the 3 who are involved in the victory fully benefit off of defeating Asuka (and it would probably be very anticlimactic)
2) having it end by some cheap tactic is exactly what WCW did wrong, which I find ironic because you just took a shot at Goldberg's winning streak but now you recommend to have Asuka's end just as shitty as his
3) that's actually it, I thought that was it lol.
1.) just like with anytnjng in wrestling, if do right, it can get over. Plus we've never seen a streak ended this way to my knowledge.
2.) it's not when it get a major heel over like Alexa. It will get massive heat and still give her credibility because she nearly beat her without it and was the only one to push her to limit.
3.) ?
All in all, the more she wins, the more it matters and the more money matches WWE can promote. Like, they have Ronda Rousey finally coming up now.. don't you think having Ronda vs an undefeated Asuka is anything but "dull"? As far as who finally goes over, that has yet to come. Who knows who they'll trust in to take that from her, we don't know if they're gonna do something shitty with Bliss or something amazing with an up-and-comer in 2-3 years, but that's the point because it keeps people guessing
"First of all, she's not a semi retired mega star, so she'll definitely be full time. Secondly it's the complete opposite. Once she loses, everything they built around her character so far was completely useless and she'll be just like any other dull face on that womens division. And the only way the streak loses it's "luster" is if she's facing people we know WWE has no interest in pushing. When she faces Emma, it's pretty clear who's going over, but if you book high quality match ups like Banks vs Asuka, people will question themselves on whether WWE's willing to make her lose yet or not. Just like people did with Ember Moon."
I'm aware she's not retired. I don't believe that at all. If that were true, Brock would suck right now and literally no one would give a shit after he lost to golderbeg. It's the opposite, and Brock came out on top. Granted he's part time, but I'm speaking in terms of winning streaks.
"Just imagine this exact comment on Taker's streak a decade ago. "Well, it loses its luster because we know he's gonna win at Mania". But it was probably the best thing to happen every Mania, wasn't it?"
It's different when someone wins every match on raw, smackdown, PPV's vs once a year. Apples and oranges. She's already lost her luster by going this long and never losing.
"1) having a streak end in a multi women match doesn't help anyone in this situation because none of the 3 who are involved in the victory fully benefit off of defeating Asuka (and it would probably be very anticlimactic)
2) having it end by some cheap tactic is exactly what WCW did wrong, which I find ironic because you just took a shot at Goldberg's winning streak but now you recommend to have Asuka's end just as shitty as his
3) that's actually it, I thought that was it lol."
1.) just like with anytnjng in wrestling, if do right, it can get over. Plus we've never seen a streak ended this way to my knowledge.
2.) it's not when it get a major heel over like Alexa. It will get massive heat and still give her credibility because she nearly beat her without it and was the only one to push her to limit.
"All in all, the more she wins, the more it matters and the more money matches WWE can promote. Like, they have Ronda Rousey finally coming up now.. don't you think having Ronda vs an undefeated Asuka is anything but "dull"? As far as who finally goes over, that has yet to come. Who knows who they'll trust in to take that from her, we don't know if they're gonna do something shitty with Bliss or something amazing with an up-and-comer in 2-3 years, but that's the point because it keeps people guessing"
No, you're wrong. It's dumb when they're undefeated nonstop, unless it's part time. It works with Brock for this reason, or did i should say. It has already lost its luster in my eyes. You named one star in Ronda rousey... lol she won't be here forever. Then who will face asuka and actually be taken seriously for 3 years straight... non stop matches with Ronda?? And take into account she needs tons of opponents over the next 3 years because she's full time, and they have to be credible adversaries. But since she's undefeated in every match, literally. It's dull and predictable.
: