Who will be the bigger star: Big E or Roman Reigns??

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Cloud

Champion
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
10,486
Reaction score
1,562
Points
118
Age
40
One odd thing about Big E is how he gets only slight pops during his entrance but the crowd gets really into his matches. Just watched his tag with Henry vs The Real Americans and the crowd got really into it.
His entrance music always seems dead quiet. I know thats nothing to do with pops but the quality seems poor compared to others.
 

Snowman1

Chillin' with the snowmies.
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
33,052
Reaction score
11,726
Points
0
Location
Cuteville
In the Daniel Bryan era size really can't matter all that much, you still see Big E and think that that's totally a dude you don't want to fuck with. The jury's still out on Reigns, but so far so good based on what we've seen so far from both.

Big E needs his old theme back though, curious to see what the Shield members get as singles guys
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
just wait until the Rumble when Reigns fucking dominates and spears half the roster
 
  • Like
Reactions: THG?

Dat Kid1

King of smurf Style
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
22,647
Reaction score
5,892
Points
0
Location
New York, NY
Website
youtube.com
E's backed by Cena apparently, so if that factors into anything I'd say Big E as it has been proven time and time again that you don't have to know how to wrestle well to hold the WWE title. Reigns has gotten better, but we haven't seen him in singles competition a lot, so I wouldn't even consider him yet. On top of that, he can't promo.

Not saying Langston can, but he's a bit better than him there
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
E's backed by Cena apparently, so if that factors into anything I'd say Big E as it has been proven time and time again that you don't have to know how to wrestle well to hold the WWE title. Reigns has gotten better, but we haven't seen him in singles competition a lot, so I wouldn't even consider him yet. On top of that, he can't promo.

Not saying Langston can, but he's a bit better than him there
I don't see why people constantly say he can't promo. Just because he isn't being given stick time doesn't mean he can't. He isn't god's gift to talkers, but he has a natural presence and charisma that can carry him through speaking segments.

Not a great example but this is all I can find off short notice, he isn't nails on a chalkboard by any means

 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
E's backed by Cena apparently, so if that factors into anything I'd say Big E as it has been proven time and time again that you don't have to know how to wrestle well to hold the WWE title. Reigns has gotten better, but we haven't seen him in singles competition a lot, so I wouldn't even consider him yet. On top of that, he can't promo.

Not saying Langston can, but he's a bit better than him there
21f5d6f621c446f3ad2fb1766aefc313.jpg


Love both, but Roman Reigns supreme. Got that IT factor