no as much as I all for taker getting one title. that would suck b/c it would one again take away cm punk monunt which I think is not fair to him. cena took from him last since it was sopost to rock vs. punk at wm29 as being the oraetal plan and then cena had bitch and take that away! though we got a great match with taker and punk it still suck punk did not get the main event! the plan if for cm punk to win the rumble and go on to win the wwe title at wm30! that would screw everything up!
Rock and Punk was never the original plan lol. At best, Punk was gonna find his way into the match with Cena and Rock and make it a three way but to be precise, that was never planned or rumored either, just speculated on and hoped for by many of us who were trying to desperately remain optimistic that it wouldn't just be a one-on-one encounter between Rock and Cena again.
However, it was clear as day after the Wrestlemania 28 finish that Rock and Cena were squaring off again the next year with Cena going over the second time around. One thing that WAS rumored though was that Punk would retain the title against The Rock and then defend it against Undertaker at Mania in a Streak/Streak match (Punk's title streak against Taker's WM streak) but I'm glad that didn't happen. If I had any choice in which part-timer got to end Punk's title reign, I'll choose seeing Rock win the title again over Taker.
What sources do you have on Punk vs Rock at mania being the original plan Gohan? Because I can find nothing on it. Rather I can find much more on Cena vs Rock 2 being the original plan all along, it was such a big focus of the build to Wrestlemania 29 (with it being a year long build) that it cannot possibly have not been the original plan.
Punk can't complain, he got to headline with the Rock for two straight ppvs, something Cena has never done.
Well sorry, I guess I just wasn't thinking when I voiced my opinion. I think him vs Cena would suck because Cena would have a Cenation of little kids on his side.(i dont know what im saying if you don't understand) but, Ryback would be horrible. Since I'm not a fan of what, old WCW or TNA, I don't really know who Sting is. I'm not getting mad or anything, but I was just caught up in the excitement of joining this forum, that I wasn't clearly and logically thinking of my choice. And I completely forgot that Sheamus was injured.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
WRONG that was acole posted last year that they had talks about cm punk vs. rock at WM29 for the wwe title. I remember it b/c it was on sescoops. but it dies as we all seen. And if that did title vs. streak it would been better b/c Taker as u seen was there for a few week so he could have won title and then have hom play save and not get him attack by the shield so he does not get injury again and have him wrestle at E.Rules were he lostest it or get screw out of it somehow.
I'm not believing it until I actually see it for myself. If the article IS real and you aren't just sorely mistaken, then it was complete bullshit. There was never anything else in the plans except for Rock and Cena to square off again, title or no title, sorry.
Ryback already said he is going to end the streak. It's over.
I know Ryback wasn't in TNA or WCW. And I just got into wrestling last year. Of course I'm not gonna know who Sting is. I know what he looks like, but I don't know him.uh? ryback was not in tna or wcw? AND HOW THE FUCK DO U NOT KNOW WHO STING IS!?
That's to be determined...Ryback already said he is going to end the streak. It's over.
I know Ryback wasn't in TNA or WCW. And I just got into wrestling last year. Of course I'm not gonna know who Sting is. I know what he looks like, but I don't know him.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
lol no, it's never going to happen, Ryback said it in some interview a month or two back.