Who should be the next to be called up?
- Thread starter Stopspot
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
Please convince me to like him. Sell him to me and make me become a mark of his, because all I see is some mediocre charisma-sucking random muscle guy who can't speak or wrestle.
Crayo said:
1. He's fucking gorgeous.
2.
3. Debuted in 1999, quite some experience, so to say.
4. Trained by: Killer Kowalski, Larry Huntley, Deep South Wrestling, Bill DeMott and Florida Championship Wrestling. Not bad.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 39,124
- Reaction score
- 5,642
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 30
- Location
- God's Country, Sheffield UK
Re: RE: Who should be the next to be called up?
1. Hi BLFFL, who marks for a guy whether he's handsome or not? I doubt your serious on the first though.
3. KK had 6 years experience, without talent it means jack
4. So someone can't blow because they had a decent trainer? These guys take anyone to make their money.
Jose Tortilla said:1. He's fucking gorgeous.
2.
3. Debuted in 1999, quite some experience, so to say.
4. Trained by: Killer Kowalski, Larry Huntley, Deep South Wrestling, Bill DeMott and Florida Championship Wrestling. Not bad.
1. Hi BLFFL, who marks for a guy whether he's handsome or not? I doubt your serious on the first though.
3. KK had 6 years experience, without talent it means jack
4. So someone can't blow because they had a decent trainer? These guys take anyone to make their money.
seabs said:
1. Be honest, he ain't the ugliest mofo you've seen.
tunga:2. Why are you comparing him to Kelly?
3. Well, it seems he has talent for the ''business''. If he wouldn't have talent, why in the blue hell would he be signed to the WWE?
Jose Tortilla said:1. Be honest, he ain't the ugliest mofo you've seen.
2. Why are you comparing him to Kelly?
3. Well, it seems he has talent for the ''business''. If he wouldn't have talent, why in the blue hell would he be signed to the WWE?
1. Judging a guy by his looks is not a completely legit reason for saying someone will be a successful wrestler.
2. That one @seabs will have to answer.
3. I'm just gonna throw out names here. Khali, Hornswoggle, Kelly Kelly, David Otunga, Mike Adamle.
Stopspot said:
3. I agree. But you just simply can't put him in the same locker as those guys you mentioned.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 39,124
- Reaction score
- 5,642
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 30
- Location
- God's Country, Sheffield UK
Saying someone has experience by itself isn't a positive, KK had 6 years and still stunk the joint out. How is Curtis debuting in 99 supposed relevant to his quality?
