- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 185,817
- Reaction score
- 39,939
- Points
- 148
- Age
- 39
- Location
- Wrestling Forums
- Website
- wrestlingsmarks.com
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Sports Team
-
- Favorite Sports Team
-
- Favorite Sports Team
-
- Favorite Sports Team
-


Ever since the return of Triple in 2001 as the new COO of WWE, the lines of authority have become blurry and bleed into one another. Made worse when Stephanie McMahon joined him and they collectively began calling themselves the Authority. Which now begs question what exactly is the role of the General Manager? Every week on Raw we see the Authority making matches for Raw, SmackDown and even WrestleMania. We barely ever see Brad Maddox anymore. Even when it's not Triple H or Stephanie, it's now Kane, the Director of Operations. What is a Director of Operations and isn't that just a General Manager or Commissioner? Do you think the days of the General Manager are over? Do you think there's just a few too many cooks in the kitchen now? If so, would you prefer they went back to just having the General Managers run the shows? And do they need two with the brand extension being over? Or should WWE give up on the notion of General Managers and just let the Authority run things? Do we even need to see them every week or just when it's warranted? And what is your opinion on Kane? Is he doing well in his new role or should we scrap that, too?
So, what are your thoughts on current day WWE authority figures? Discuss.