who do you think wa sthe worst wwe champion of all time?

[CT Styles]

That doesn't sound so bad, I've heard worse. Did you just say that to try and impress people by knowing a '70s wrestler?

 

[Nancy Di Loreto]

Not at all. I know plenty of 70's wrestlers. Dusty Rhodes, Ricky Steamboat, Andre the Giant, I could go on for days. Oh, there's another terrible champion, Andre.

 

[joker666]

Edge....hey heres and idea how bout getting the title in an actual match for once

 

[Nancy Di Loreto]

Edge....hey heres and idea how bout getting the title in an actual match for once

Last Sunday?

 

[OWeapon]

Edge....hey heres and idea how bout getting the title in an actual match for once

Last Sunday?

Fucking owned.

 

[Airfixx]

(In releatively recent memory...)

Jeff Hardy.



A couple more....

Hogan (Wrestlemania9 > KOTR93)
Hogan (Tuesday in Texas > A few night's later when the belt was vacated.)

 

[Hidden Blaze]

The Great Khalil comes to mind.

That reign sucked IMO.

 

[SnackZ]

Hogan as champ never sucked. Blasphemy I tell you!!!! Hardy as champ sucked, Khali was pointless and Rey was bullshit.

 

[noumenon]

Rey, Khali, Jeff, CM Punk (his WHC reign, not ECW).... thats all I've got in recent memory..basically the failed transitional champs.

Sorry I didn't add much...lmao:blowup:

 

[Airfixx]

Hogan as champ never sucked

By all means then, offer an explaination as to why the reigns of his I mentioned didn't suck....

 

[SnackZ]

Because Hogan is GOD. Nah, j/k - I jsut don't like when people badmouth Hogan, I love the guy, even got a tattoo of him flexing on my forearm. I can't argue against what you said, but those can't be worse than Khali or Rey.

 

[taikimoto]

Rey Mysterio for the WWE era just for his size.
As for WWWF the Iron Shiek just for the way
they used him to put the belt on Hogan

 

[Airfixx]

Because Hogan is GOD. Nah, j/k - I jsut don't like when people badmouth Hogan, I love the guy, even got a tattoo of him flexing on my forearm.

Regardless of your taste in tattoos ( : P ), I wasn't badmouthing Hogan.

I can't argue against what you said, but those can't be worse than Khali or Rey.

I don't see how...

WM9 stank pure and simple and then what happens...? The title and Hogan dissapear off the map until it's time for Hogan to drop the belt 3 nearly months later thanks to that bullshit incident with the camera-man that (pressumably to protect Hogan and the the rediculously shallow booking of his character at the time) was never explained.... Then he leaves WWE.

Whether down to Hogan politicing, the bookers or a mix of both, it fuckin' sucked!!!


I'll turn a blind eye to the Hogan/Taker scenario purely because it freed up the belt for Flair's awesome World Title RRumble win, but the reign itself was shite. (Look at it this way, what does a dirty title win over a heel that hasn't, himself, wronged the face do for teh face's character? ...Especially if they're gonna take the belt straight back off of him? By the end of that program Hogan looked more heel than Taker which was made worse still with the balatant kayfaybe favouritism shown by Tunney making Hogan the original #1 contender @ WM8.)

 

[Airfixx]

As for WWWF the Iron Shiek just for the way they used him to put the belt on Hogan

I think Sheik as champ was a particularly good transitional reign for 2 main reasons:

1. Given the political climate, the heat for Sheik and subsequent pop when he finally dropped the title = smart booking.

2. The Backlund > Sheik title exchange went down in WWF history as a moment in it's own right (Backlund's manager submitting on his behalf)... So much so that they used a virtually identicle angle to have Backlund beat Bret Hart for the title @ SSeries 94.

 

[straight_edge76]

Vince McMahon lol