RIght now, the roster has Bo Dallas. Bo Dallas brings ratings. But seriously, I can't wait to see the future of the WWE when Cena, Orton, and others are gone. It's going to feel weird but it's going to be great.
FUCK Bo Dallas, I hope you were being sarcastic.RIght now, the roster has Bo Dallas. Bo Dallas brings ratings. But seriously, I can't wait to see the future of the WWE when Cena, Orton, and others are gone. It's going to feel weird but it's going to be great.
Have you not watched NXT? His gimmick is literally a troll lolFUCK Bo Dallas, I hope you were being sarcastic.
Oh yeah, caught the "invitational" a few weeks back (good ending), but I need to catch up now. The entire crowd HATES the guy but he acts like he doesn't get it.Have you not watched NXT? His gimmick is literally a troll lol
Nice sig btw. I saw Big Show leaving that guy hanging on RAW and laughed pretty good.Have you not watched NXT? His gimmick is literally a troll lol
Oh yeah, caught the "invitational" a few weeks back (good ending), but I need to catch up now. The entire crowd HATES the guy but he acts like he doesn't get it.
I know but I REALLY hate him lol. Guess that makes for a good heel though eh?That's the point lol
Ye, He brings ratings and the heat.I know but I REALLY hate him lol. Guess that makes for a good heel though eh?
Anyone say 92?
Hulk Hogan (red and yellow)
Flair
Savage
Ultimate warrior
Legion of doom
Jake the Snake
Sid Vicious
Classic Taker
Big boss man
HBK (Rockers)
Mr. Perfect
Yokozuna
Razor Ramon
British Bulldog
Owen Hart
Nasty Boys
Bushwhackers
Seriously...there's some new jackass running around attacking people for no reason and ranting that 1992 was the greatest year in pro wrestling history on this thread.
It's not that there's not some great arguments for 1992 being the best roster of all time (you've listed several of those arguments...and they're very strong, obviously), it's the way he's doing it.
But...to the point, good point, sir.
wk
Saw both, personally enjoyed 92 better.I wasn't around to watch the product in 92 (Only 4), and I can only speak to the guys that I've went backed and watched. On paper it looks like a great roster, but is it better than the late 90's early 2000's? That's completely subjective.
How is Hogan/Vince refusing to let Flair go over 'for good reasons'? Those are terrible reasons, especially since Hogan needed to lay low, PUT FLAIR OVER AND LET HIM CARRY THE COMPANY.
Saw both, personally enjoyed 92 better.
Did a heel ever walk out of the mania Main event as the victor pre HHH at WM 2000? It'd seem to send the fans home unhappy at the pinnacle of their calendar.