What's with this hankering for TV 14?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Farooq

Chairwoman of The New Day
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
23,193
Reaction score
7,027
Points
0
Location
619
People seem to neglect that also WWE was PG before 14, and it was still very good.
 

Dat Kid1

King of smurf Style
Joined
Sep 2, 2012
Messages
22,647
Reaction score
5,892
Points
0
Location
New York, NY
Website
youtube.com
Farrrooq Garrett Bischoff said:
People seem to neglect that also WWE was PG before 14, and it was still very good.

The difference between now and then is that there were more wrestlers with gimmicks. Now wrestlers are just people with the exception of very few and the gimmicks back then were more over the top than the ones now.

What I think went wrong is that the Attitude Era brought about this age of realness. Less gimmicks and more real people and it worked because people weren't limited as to what they wanted to say because of TV-14.

When PG came back WWE failed to recognize what made it successful were the gimmicks. Now there's a whole bunch of wrestlers who are just people and not as over the top like the 80's. It's like trying to run the attitude era under PG, as if trying to satisfy both types of fans. It's not working IMO, it's similar to the reason why Jerry Springer isn't PG, it doesn't work well because then it'd just be civil people talking out their differences and who wants to see that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lockard 23