What's the best number of pay-per-views for a company?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Aids Johnson

The Beast
Champion
Joined
May 25, 2012
Messages
44,717
Reaction score
8,455
Points
0
I'm fine with 4 PPVs, but I'd be cool with 6 too.

I'd prefer 6, but only when the company gets shit together. If they resign hogan, fuck them. Ill watch but im done saying what works better, as management clearly doesnt give a fuck about making good decisions.

That being said, if they dont? They will have enough cash for a decent amount of indy wrestlers. Add in a REAL x-division feud/build ffs since it hasnt been worth shit since Ion got ass cancer. They could have King/Dutt/Morgan/Ryan/3 Kos who arent named velvet or mickie/rubix/any other indy who can make the midcard.

TNA has a shitload of quality upper level talent. They also have assholes like sting and hogan, they finally got rid of Mickie and fucked up by giving ODB the title, and they will continue to treat her as good/slightly better than the x-division champ. That is what TNA needs more than PPV. THis Aces and 8s mem hogan dixie bullshit needs to end, and we need to have build in different divisions. TV title is with Abyss, WHILE THEY DRAG JOSEPH PARK OUT WEEK IN AND WEEK FUCKING OUT. Hes a fat, out of shape, pathetic, piece of shit lawyer, i get it. He learned in OVW, you didnt do shit for that in more than 2 impact shows. He is abyss, we get it.

I think the best # of ppv's is based on the build of stars you make in your company. Pretending your fans are fucking idiots who dont deserve good matches with a build that makes them want to choose sides is just pathetic, and the last two months of WWE have been that exact same story.
 

Toto

The Showoff
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
1,388
Reaction score
173
Points
0
Age
25
Location
Argentina
6 a year would be perfect, you have a lot of time to build the storylines
It would be like this:
January: Royal rumble
February
march : Elimination Chamber
april
may: Wrestlemania
june
Juy: Extreme Rules
August
September:TLC
october
November :Survivor Series
december
 

Messiah1

The Showoff
Banned
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
919
Reaction score
211
Points
43
Location
Toronto
6 PPV's a year would be perfect.

January - Royal Rumble
March/April - WrestleMania
June - Money in the Bank (move it from July)
August - SummerSlam
October - Hell in the Cell (early October)
November - Survivor Series
 

HIGH FLYER

The Artiste
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
126
Reaction score
37
Points
0
Age
38
They'll make even more before cutting any as long as people keep buying them.. $$$
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
34
6 or 8.

4 fucking sucks. It has almost killed my interest in TNA (along with other things). I swear it feels like it has been years since we had a TNA PPV
 

Irwin R. Schyster

The Showoff
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
779
Reaction score
489
Points
0
Location
Abigail
I've always said the WWE should have the big 4: Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series. When I was a kid, this was what they had, and they built up the feuds so you actually gave a shit about them. Now, you don't get the build up because there is a PPV every 3 weeks, and you get the same guys fighting 900000 times in a row. They are all the same matches you watch the next night on Raw. Why would anyone want to pay for a PPV event when they can watch it on cable the next night? Ridiculous bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Senhor Perfect

BruceHart

Jobber
Banned
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
42
Valid points here IRS.....I agree completely. The Big Four PPV's were huge, especially back in the day. I still find Royal a good watch because of the action and the legends that get involved. It's not easy to get a feud a over well in the few weeks in between PPV's. Hogan and Macho Man could feud for a whole entire year and it wouldn't get stale. The WWE may have expanded too much where they have on too many shows and too many story lines. They need to be able to string out some feuds a little longer so it brings more allure to the PPV. Instead most feuds go one PPV and then a new feud is started. On another note TNA is complete garbage and will never realistically compete with the WWE.