- Joined
- Dec 16, 2011
- Messages
- 63,815
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- Points
- 1
- Location
- United Kingdom of Ambrose
- Website
- wweforums.net
Rainman said:There haven't been many good ones since 2008-2009, but which feuds were the best?
Punk and Jericho this year was pretty good, and Punk vs WWE in 2011 was what it was. There are people out there who liked Orton vs Christian, and there was the 2009 Cena vs Orton feud that was awesome despite it going on way too long. Cena vs Nexus may have piqued your interest, Edge vs Jericho, Cena vs Batista, Mark Henry vs Big Show, maybe something in the mid-card?
As for me, 2009 CM Punk vs Jeff Hardy. Punk didn't need MITB, that feud made him a main-eventer and a half.
TheoneandonlyDC said:CM Punk VS Jeff Hardy from 2009
Best feud I have seen in years. I was sad that Jeff lost at SummerSlam. I never got why Jeff couldn't win that and then CM Punk come out on Smackdown saying he wanted a rematch and then both their contracts got put on the line then taker comes out and takes out punk.
But if they had Hardy win at SS (which he deserved a big win at a top PPV) and then Punk still could have took his title and retired him the following Smackdown.Crayo said:I see this posted often but I'm baffled by it. I don't see why a superstar who is leaving the company (or more so being chucked out) needs to leave on a win, when you have one of the best heels in the company feuding with him. It only makes sense imo to have Punk go over a top face and "retire" him to further push his heel persona.
TheoneandonlyDC said:But if they had Hardy win at SS (which he deserved a big win at a top PPV) and then Punk still could have took his title and retired him the following Smackdown.
Crayo said:No idea why I put Kane instead of Punk
Cena/Kane was one of the worst lol.