A 5 star match? Based on whose ratings? Yours? Meltzers?I respect your opinion but wow Cena over Joe? Five Star matches:
Joe - 1 or 2 (forgot if Joe vs. Punk 2 was a 5 star)
Cena - 0
Sorry, I prefer to think for myself, and Joe has never been in anything better than a 3 and a half star match for my money. His pussified slapfest with Kobashi is so ridiculously overrated by Meltzer it makes everything else he does look ridiculous, and Joe vs. Punk 2 wasn't near as good as Joe vs. Punk 3...which was about a 3 and a half star match, and the only ROH match I've ever seen that I enjoyed.
Well, mine generally fall in line with the success wrestlers find in the business so...I guess you have a different view about what good wrestlers are.
See, this is just what I don't understand. When has HHH or Randy Orton EVER had a high quality match without some outstanding on the opposite side of them? They haven't.But when Cena has great matches it's down to who his opponent is say if its HBK, HHH, Orton they can carry virtually anyone and the can make a match look amazing no matter who they have in the ring for example HBK vs Ric Flair wm24, Flair IMO is a legend and fantastic but he is old and not as nimble, strong, or as fit as he use to be hence HBK carried him the match was mint.
The simple fact is that Cena is better in the ring than both of them. This notion that Cena has to be carried to have a great match is ridiculous. He's done it with so many different people, many of whom are inferior workers to him, that the argument doesn't hold water.
No, Cena is a main-event caliber wrestler.