WrestleMania What if Ziggler doesn't cash in?

[Crayo]

For some reason, I have a problem with the idea of Mr. MITB being in a title match for the same title he has the contract for but I still really like this idea.

Do you know why you have this problem? It sells the feud. You could have a segment in the build up where Dolph is ditching his briefcase because he has his shot now, and when he loses the crowd will inevitably mock him, but then Dolph can go under the ring and emerge with it. Would be a good Wrestlemania moment imo.

 

[Mustafar Reginald]

Do you know why you have this problem? It sells the feud. You could have a segment in the build up where Dolph is ditching his briefcase because he has his shot now, and when he loses the crowd will inevitably mock him, but then Dolph can go under the ring and emerge with it. Would be a good Wrestlemania moment imo.

Not entirely sure. It's definitely nothing from a rational perspective, there is just something about it that bothers me. Maybe it's just some honor before reason BS thing, like why would the GM give someone a title shot who already has a guaranteed shot at the belt? I don't know, that's the best I can come up with. Still, the idea is great and I wouldn't be against it happening or anything like that it's just that one aspect that kind of irks me.

 

[Crayo]

You could have held a #1 contender tournament on SmackDown hosted over the space of a few weeks which Dolph Ziggler wins.

 

[Lockard 23]

I had an idea similar to that last year. Whether it took place at Wrestlemania or not being irrelevant, it's really one of the only real fresh ways to have a cash in that we haven't seen before.

 

[Nano]

If he doesn't cash in he won't be the "great" wrestler he think he is

 

[Stopspot]

^Kayfab

 

[seabs]

You're at the top of the page broda.

 

[Stopspot]

Look at the last post of the previous page Hulkamaniac.

 

[seabs]

Yeah the brother is rocking a Park badge.

 

[Stopspot]

Is there Hulkamania here?

 

[seabs]

OH MY BROTHER THERE AREN'T ANY HULKAMANIACS IN HERE

Anyway stop spamming Stop :tough:

DZ will cash in and go on a good reign, this is similar to what Bryan got for a while.

 

[Leo C]

@Crayo

 

[Nano]

DZ will cash in and go on a good reign, this is similar to what Bryan got for a while.

Think so but he may just cash before the contract expires because he isn't finding the moment to cash in...

 

[Roi]

He wins MITB at the next MITB PPV and holds the briefcase for a record time.

He doesnt cash in the first one , wins the second one and cashes in the same night

 

[Lockard 23]

It would have been interesting if at some point, someone (Ziggler or whoever) managed to win both MITB briefcases and always came out walking with one in each hand. He'd have a ticket to both the WWE Title and WHC.

If this was 2010, it could have worked out with him winning the WM26 MITB briefcase and then winning the next one at the first ever Money In The Bank PPV. Or perhaps this year, he could win one and then challenge the winner of the other to put the briefcase up for grabs on Raw or Smackdown or a PPV, and then take it from him there, like Edge did with Mr. Kennedy in 2007.