What if Rollins actually.......

[Roadster]

Would it be cool? Hell yeah. But looking back in retrospect a couple of months or years later, everyone will realize that it was a horrible move.

Overpushing a star has been known to kill heat, i.e Chris Jericho. Having him beat everyone from Ambrose to Cena to Lesnar, and have him hold both of the titles, only to have him beat Sting, Sheamus and Cena in one-night would be a horrible move.

And then it would put him in the delicate situation as Lesnar, where no one can legit beat the guy in a clean fashion. Even if he's a heel.

 

[Rogue]

Unless WWE tries to switch it up from their biggest 'competitor' in North America and actually have Rollins lose one of the two matches, then I'd say he's pretty much a shoe-in to retain both titles.

Beating Sting alone clean sounds reasonable, but Cena as well? I don't know. And that doesn't even involve Sheamus.

Speaking of Sheamus though, here's a question. What if he cashed in on Rollins after he beats/loses to Cena, won, and then beat Sting? That'd be a firm way to truly propel him in a position in which we'd recogonoze him as the top guy. Instead of seeing him as just another guy who cashed in and got lucky. He's not a coward heel, but a dominant one. And that'd be believable after a night like that. Kinda grasping at straws on that one as well, though.