I understood your point. I just like analogies. And hating on the WWE. And food. The chance to combine all 3 of those presented itself, and I wasn't about to pass it up.
Also, just because it's easier doesn't make it right, or even really make sense. It's not the one "sports entertainer" (shame on you for using that naughty "w" word) who is the problem, it's the company who presents him like that. Generally speaking, Roman is merely a scapegoat that people use who believe it's easier to blame one wrestler, but usually their problems are actually with the company itself anyway. If that makes sense