Vince russo on Triple H's comments and Chyna

[Dolph'sZiggler]

What does it matter if someone learns about her porn career anyway? I doubt children are gonna be scarred for life if they find out that someone they just witnessed get inducted into the Hall of Fame used to have a career in porn. Porn is just the convenient excuse here. HHH might still carry some bad blood, and even if he doesn't, it would surprise me very little to learn Stephanie still might.

HHH already explained it ffs. Kid sees Chyna, kid googles Chyna, kid sees Chyna getting railed by 10 dudes.

not a good look for the company, so she won't be involved with it. I don't see what is so hard to understand for some of you.

 

[The GOAT]

HHH already explained it ffs. Kid sees Chyna, kid googles Chyna, kid sees Chyna getting railed by 10 dudes.

not a good look for the company, so she won't be involved with it. I don't see what is so hard to understand for some of you.

Yeah, I saw HHH's explanation, thanks for paraphrasing. I'm just saying it's weak, especially when you've got former alcoholics and drug addicts and a possible murderer in the HOF, but yet the 'evils' of pornography is the thing that just can't be tolerated. It's not like WWE are promoting or mentioning her porn career in any way by inducting her. Weak.

Btw, if you type in 'Chyna' into the Google search engine, nothing about porn immediately pops up. There is virtually nothing about porn at all on the first several pages (only an article listing things that WWE doesn't want you to find out about Chyna, and I doubt kids would actually bother to read through that entire thing), nor are any of the first several pictures of her on Google of her "getting railed by ten different guys." Typing in Joanie Laurer is a slightly different story, but still.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Yeah, I saw HHH's explanation, thanks for paraphrasing. I'm just saying it's weak, especially when you've got former alcoholics and drug addicts and a possible murderer in the HOF, but yet the 'evils' of pornography is the thing that just can't be tolerated. It's not like WWE are promoting or mentioning her porn career in any way by inducting her. Weak.

Btw, if you type in 'Chyna' into the Google search engine, nothing about porn immediately pops up. There is virtually nothing about porn at all on the first several pages (only an article listing things that WWE doesn't want you to find out about Chyna, and I doubt kids would actually bother to read through that entire thing), nor are any of the first several pictures of her on Google of her "getting railed by ten different guys." Typing in Joanie Laurer is a slightly different story, but still.

lol I still don't see what is "weak" about it. Alcoholics and drug addicts are a far cry from porn. Nobody is saying porn is some horrible evil, again, HHH said he doesn't give a shit what she does with her life. This is business. Stop playing dumb.

 

[The GOAT]

lol I still don't see what is "weak" about it. Alcoholics and drug addicts are a far cry from porn. Nobody is saying porn is some horrible evil, again, HHH said he doesn't give a shit what she does with her life. This is business. Stop playing dumb.

I already broke down some reasons for why it's a very weak and feeble argument. She isn't being inducted for anything she did in porn, she's being inducted for her WWE career, and there's no reason to even mention anything relating to her porn days. And the idea that she shouldn't be inducted for one night of the year because there might be a few kids (out of thousands) out there who might learn that she used to have a career in adult entertainment? Really? You don't see that as a weak-ass argument? If a kid has internet access, he or she can discover a lot of nasty things about a lot of different people, even just within the entertainment industry. It literally feels like a very minuscule thing to be concerned about.

And lol @ "Drug addicts and alcoholics aren't nearly as bad as porn actors!"

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I already broke down some reasons for why it's a very weak and feeble argument. She isn't being inducted for anything she did in porn, she's being inducted for her WWE career, and there's no reason to even mention anything relating to her porn days. And the idea that she shouldn't be inducted for one night of the year because there might be a few kids (out of thousands) out there who might learn that she used to have a career in adult entertainment? Really? You don't see that as a weak-ass argument? If a kid has internet access, he or she can discover a lot of nasty things about a lot of different people, even just within the entertainment industry. It literally feels like a very minuscule thing to be concerned about.

And lol @ "Drug addicts and alcoholics aren't nearly as bad as porn actors!"

We are going to have to agree to disagree. Your argument of "kids can find porn without Chyna!" is fucking terrible dude. And I'm not saying drug addicts are bad or porn stars are bad. Again, live your own fucking life. I'm simply saying as far as WWE is concerned, porn is a lot more damning, and if you don't understand how I can't help you out dude.

Where is the first place people go to find out about someone they are unfamiliar with? You know the answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chyna

Full section dedicated to her porn career

 

[The GOAT]

We are going to have to agree to disagree. Your argument of "kids can find porn without Chyna!" is fucking terrible dude. And I'm not saying drug addicts are bad or porn stars are bad. Again, live your own fucking life. I'm simply saying as far as WWE is concerned, porn is a lot more damning, and if you don't understand how I can't help you out dude.

Where is the first place people go to find out about someone they are unfamiliar with? You know the answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chyna

Full section dedicated to her porn career

And it's the least covered section of the entire page... Hardly anything to get up in arms about.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

And it's the least covered section of the entire page... Hardly anything to get up in arms about.

Nobody is up in arms. She simply won't be in the HOF. End of discussion.

 

[The GOAT]

Nobody is up in arms. She simply won't be in the HOF. End of discussion.

She probably will once WWE admits her past isn't a big deal. There's been far more improbable things that have happened before than Chyna getting a HOF induction.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

She probably will once WWE admits her past isn't a big deal. There's been far more improbable things that have happened before than Chyna getting a HOF induction.

Hey, I doubt it. More agreeing to disagree.

They might induct her ass after she dies lol. typical WWE

 

[Zany Clowny]

You can't compare drug use to pornography. It's not like there's real evidence of a wrestler using drugs, you won't find a video of some wrestler shooting up heroin. If she allegedly did porn (like that xpac sextape) and it was mostly just an old rumor, sure. But you can see her in clear HD taking dick for money. They just aren't comparable.

 

[The GOAT]

You can't compare drug use to pornography. It's not like there's real evidence of a wrestler using drugs, you won't find a video of some wrestler shooting up heroin. If she allegedly did porn (like that xpac sextape) and it was mostly just an old rumor, sure. But you can see her in clear HD taking dick for money. They just aren't comparable.

They are in terms of questionable moral choices.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

They are in terms of questionable moral choices.

Morals are very subjective, but nobody is talking about morals being what is keeping Chyna out of the HOF.

 

[The GOAT]

Morals are very subjective, but nobody is talking about morals being what is keeping Chyna out of the HOF.

Not wanting children to be exposed to the existence and possible visuals of porn is pretty much directly tied to morality. Just because they aren't judging Chyna for it personally doesn't subtract morality from the equation.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Not wanting children to be exposed to the existence and possible visuals of porn is pretty much directly tied to morality. Just because they aren't judging Chyna for it personally doesn't subtract morality from the equation.

Not wanting to steer kids toward watching porn at a very young age is less morality and more just common sense.

Anywho, for the 3rd time, I'm bowing out. If you think WWE has flimsy reasoning for not letting her in the WWE HOF, you and Russo are in the minority. Most realize it is practical business.

 

[Majour]

How is being a convicted rapist (Mike Tyson) not as bad as being in a porno?