Not really. Steph is the Chairwoman and can technically overrule anything Nick wants.Steph and Nick Khan co-CEOs.
Khans run wrestling.
Not really. Steph is the Chairwoman and can technically overrule anything Nick wants.Steph and Nick Khan co-CEOs.
Khans run wrestling.
one thing to consider:
Vince McMahon has officially retired as WWE CEO.
this does NOT mean he's stepping away from creative, hence why I wont celebrate too much. this could be simbolic in nature, he's still on the board of directors and majority owner etc etc.
As if that'd make a difference. If Vince calls Steph and says "push XY", they'll sure as shit push XY and there won't be anyone who'll go to the police to rat about it.
Yea, of course. Steph just won't gonna do it.Maybe. But the point is legally Steph could tell him no. And Vince would have no recourse except to call a shareholder's meeting.
Yea, of course. Steph just won't gonna do it.
Not against her dad though. Steph is as corporate as they come.I don't know Babe. She's got some hug lady balls.
Yeah but the point is that if she decides to go against him, legally, she would be in charge. It's all up to herNot against her dad though. Steph is as corporate as they come.
Trying to lure women in his limo with autographed pictures of Roman Reigns.I wonder what Vince is gonna do with himself. The man was literally addicted to work. I don’t think he ever took a vacation
Trying to lure women in his limo with autographed pictures of Roman Reigns.
Oh you didn't know?Yikes. I would use Austin Theory. He has a better package than Roman
Oh you didn't know?
That doesn't negate the fact that he has a good package
Yeah this post was when the news was coming out and we werent sure yet. Since been clarifiedThat is not correct. He is now legally forbidden to be involved in any decisions for WWE without holding a shareholder's meeting.