Unifying the US & IC titles

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Brad.

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Feb 27, 2013
Messages
2,146
Reaction score
502
Points
0
WWE Talks To Big E Langston and Dean Ambrose About Unifying the US & IC Titles
http://www.pwmania.com/wwe-talks-to...-about-unifying-the-us-ic-titles#.UrxokvRdWt8

WWE’s website has a new article up asking if the United States Title and the Intercontinental Title should be unified. It features quotes from current champions Dean Ambrose and Big E Langston. Here are some highlights:

WWE.COM: Let’s get right to it: Do you think the United States Title and the Intercontinental Title should be unified?

BIG E LANGSTON: I’d be open to it. If it strengthens the legitimacy of both titles, then I’m all for it.

DEAN AMBROSE: It’d be a good thing as long as they made one good looking championship for me to haul around, because I’d definitely be the one holding it.

WWE.COM: Is there a downside to unifying the titles?

AMBROSE: On the one hand, you’d have fewer titles for people to go for. On the other, it would be a prize that people would definitely want to come after. Nobody wants to come after my United States Title, because everyone has fallen so short and felt the hammer come down from The Shield afterward. It’s a very dangerous proposition to come after my title, so maybe having the championships unified would offer a little more prize money for people to want to go after.

LANGSTON: I can’t remark on how people would feel positively or negatively, but it would definitely bring more attention to the titles.

WWE.COM: It sounds like you’re both prepared for an eventual champion vs. champion showdown.

LANGSTON: I’d welcome the challenge.

AMBROSE: I feel that what I’ve given and sacrificed for the U.S. Title, I’d be willing to put that on the line as a pride thing. It’s just as good as the Intercontinental Title. That’s something I’d be willing to prove.

Looks like this is going to happen as part of Langston's push. Just lol.
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
If they do it they should do it post-mania. If they do it leading up to mania it will be overshadowed by other matches.
Do it post mania, then introduce another singles belt for lower carders after that (hello euro belt)
 

Stopspot

Now I’m a big, fat dynamo!
Joined
Apr 1, 2012
Messages
42,192
Reaction score
8,467
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Sweden
If they do this they also need to do some serious work on the US belt. Ambrose hardly defends it as it is and it is hardly mentioned in anything other than passing whilst they seem to be putting a lot of focus on the IC belt now. And Big E always talks it up when he has the mic now, which brings attention to the belt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vice

Pratchett

The Artiste
Joined
Nov 9, 2013
Messages
276
Reaction score
119
Points
0
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio
If they do this they also need to do some serious work on the US belt. Ambrose hardly defends it as it is and it is hardly mentioned in anything other than passing whilst they seem to be putting a lot of focus on the IC belt now. And Big E always talks it up when he has the mic now, which brings attention to the belt.
At this point though they might as well combine the two and just have the IC belt. Since there is no attention at all being paid to it, it makes no sense to even have the US belt. I for one never understood why there was an IC belt and a European belt back in the day.

Although one thing that might help overall is if the WWE actually spent more time making their belts and their champions more noteworthy. There is way too much time being spent on all the storylines and alternate storylines. Where have all the PAYOFFS gone to?
 

Action Jackson

The Lunatic Fringe
Banned
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
615
Points
0
Age
44
I'm fairly certain they'll unify the titles.

Think about it, Big E and Dean already have history. That match they had previously was a fucking slobberknocker. Langston still might have that scar on his eye from it.

Big E vs Ambrose to unify the IC and US straps would be a big match, one that might wait until WrestleMania.
 

Vice

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
2,033
Reaction score
730
Points
0
Location
Maryland
I'm all for it. Personally, I think that since wwe is basically all one roster, there should be one major title, one minor, one for the tag team division, and a divas title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowman1

HIGH FLYER

The Artiste
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
126
Reaction score
37
Points
0
Age
38
WWE>WHC>IC>US.. that is correct, right?? if so, they should keep both, but let some mid-carters and the under-carters duke it out for the US title.. let them have something to strive for imo
 

Action Jackson

The Lunatic Fringe
Banned
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
615
Points
0
Age
44
They wouldn't lose the IC Title. That's like dropping the WWE title for the World title. It's not even up for discussion.
 

Lockard 23

The WWF/E Guru
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
6,691
Reaction score
1,927
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Union City, Tennessee
If they do it they should do it post-mania. If they do it leading up to mania it will be overshadowed by other matches.
Do it post mania, then introduce another singles belt for lower carders after that (hello euro belt)

Why get rid of the United States belt only to reintroduce a belt that has less prestige and history?

I'm personally hoping against this personally. I think it's beneficial for the midcard to have two singles championships (though not a necessity by any means.) If they do go right ahead with it though, I have no doubt it'll be done on Raw. It may seem like a waste but they rushed the big world title unification to a B-PPV with only a three week build, so expect them to do even less for this. Plus, they wasted away the unifications of the IC/European and IC/Hardcore titles on Raw back in '02 as well. With Langston recently feuding with The Shield, I could see them going ahead and getting this out of the way before the Rumble even happens.
 

Action Jackson

The Lunatic Fringe
Banned
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Messages
1,690
Reaction score
615
Points
0
Age
44
Why get rid of the United States belt only to reintroduce a belt that has less prestige and history?

I'm personally hoping against this personally. I think it's beneficial for the midcard to have two singles championships (though not a necessity by any means.) If they do go right ahead with it though, I have no doubt it'll be done on Raw. It may seem like a waste but they rushed the big world title unification to a B-PPV with only a three week build, so expect them to do even less for this. Plus, they wasted away the unifications of the IC/European and IC/Hardcore titles on Raw back in '02 as well. With Langston recently feuding with The Shield, I could see them going ahead and getting this out of the way before the Rumble even happens.

Touche.