Undertaker at WM 32? vs. Sting?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
683
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
Source

undertaker-sting-600x300.jpg

The Undertaker is planning on working next year’s WrestleMania 32, reports PWInsider. He was telling people backstage at WrestleMania 31 that he felt fine after his match with Bray Wyatt and will be back for a match next year.

His opponent could possibly be Sting. The WCW icon was sharing a locker room with The Undertaker this past weekend, and apparently there was a lot of talk about a potential match. It was a subject that others in the locker room were also talking about, in addition to the legions of wrestling fans who have long desired the match.

Indeed, when Sting appeared on Raw this week, in a segment that aired on WWE Network, fans showered him with “Undertaker” chants when Rennee Young asked about the future. Sting didn’t rule it out, but was also vague about what his future will be.

The trouble is that Sting lost to Triple H at WrestleMania 31. If The Undertaker is working next year, in front of the 100,000 capacity Cowboys Stadium in Dallas, Texas, he isn’t going to want to lose. There’s no way Taker will job in front of his home fans.

But neither is Sting going to want to lose. Can you imagine it? A WCW guy works two matches against WWE guys and loses both? It wouldn’t work.

What WWE will need to do is have Sting work at SummerSlam and put him over somebody else first. He needs to be built up for The Undertaker match.

The two were pictured at the airport together on Tuesday, possibly talking about what they could be doing next year?

It is just huge speculation. The Undertaker says he feels fine but Do you think he looks ok?
 

Prince Bálor

I'm kind of a big deal
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
24,384
Reaction score
6,635
Points
0
Location
Serbia
Sting vs Taker at WM 32 in their retirement match sits well with me. Wouldn't surprise me at all if it happened.
 

Lackin

I'm a F'kn Mark - It's my real name.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
683
Points
113
Age
26
Location
Cheshire, UK
Favorite Sports Team
zFgjY9e
Sting vs Taker at WM 32 in their retirement match sits well with me. Wouldn't surprise me at all if it happened.
A retirement match is what the fans want. Just think If sting loses back-2-back loses at WM.
 

Prince Bálor

I'm kind of a big deal
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
24,384
Reaction score
6,635
Points
0
Location
Serbia
A retirement match is what the fans want. Just think If sting loses back-2-back loses at WM.

Well, Taker ain't taking 2 WM losses either. Sting's prolly been promised a HOF induction in the near future, so losing to Trips this year and to Taker next year is what's gonna get him into the HOF.
 

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Chicago
Since Sting lost to Triple H this year, I don't see this match happening. I mean it really kind of made Sting look weak. I feel that Triple H should've jobbed this one. Then let Sting lose next year in a retirement match. Triple H just beat Brock at Mania 29 and then lost to DB at Mania 30. He could've taken one more loss and not looked too weak. I didn't mind Triple H winning per say, but if they plan on doing Taker and Sting next year, the logic is off.
 

Dolph'sZiggler

Biggest self-mark since Bret Hart
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47,754
Reaction score
14,050
Points
0
Age
33
A retirement match is what the fans want. Just think If sting loses back-2-back loses at WM.
I think retirement is what the fans want to see. The match is ehhh
 

Green Jesus

The Showoff
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
874
Reaction score
270
Points
0
Age
29
What the fuck, why. If you're really going with another undertaker match just make it a bray wyatt vs taker 2. Taker wouldn't look as bad losing seeing as it would be Bray's second attempt and the taking of the torch is a cool enough way of ending his carreer.

If they want taker to go out winning doe, they can fuck right off with the idea with putting him with another young guy. Just slap him this face-painted dinossaur as this rumor says and be done with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: edge4ever

Leo C

Backlund Mark
Joined
Apr 7, 2012
Messages
23,437
Reaction score
2,232
Points
0
Age
28
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
What the fuck, why. If you're really going with another taker match just make it a bray wyatt vs taker 2. Taker wouldn't look as bad losing seeing as it would be Bray's second attempt and the taking of the torch is a cool enough way of ending taker's carreer.

If they want taker to go out winning doe, they can fuck right off with the idea with putting him with another young guy. Just slap him this face-painted dinossaur as this rumor says and be done with it.
:lol1: I approve of this approach to the situation.
 

edge4ever

The Game
Technician
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
6,222
Reaction score
2,273
Points
0
Age
34
Location
Chicago
What the fuck, why. If you're really going with another taker match just make it a bray wyatt vs taker 2. Taker wouldn't look as bad losing seeing as it would be Bray's second attempt and the taking of the torch is a cool enough way of ending taker's carreer.

If they want taker to go out winning doe, they can fuck right off with the idea with putting him with another young guy. Just slap him this face-painted dinossaur as this rumor says and be done with it.
Agreed, taker and sting would be dumb. Considering sting lost, too. Wyatt winningsnd taking takers soul would be best
 

The GOAT

The Architect
Hotshot
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
3,334
Reaction score
1,703
Points
0
Age
37
Zero fucks. Although if it prevents either guy from going over a younger superstar, then I'm all for it.