MikeRaw
Guest

Wrestlemania 25- April 5th, 2009
Backlash-April 26th, 2009
Judgment Day- May 17th, 2009
Extreme Rules-June 7th, 2009
Great American Bash-June 28th, 2009
That's too much. That's 1 PPV every 3 weeks, from WM until Great American Bash. It goes further as well. But really, back in the day, when they had interpromotional PPV's (until mid 2003) there were a hell of a lot less PPV's. Then, when they did seperate brand PPV's, they made them as frequent as they are now. That's fine, I get it. Each brand had a seperate PPV set, so a guy on one show was really only on PPV once every 6 weeks. Now though, they do interpromotional PPV's every time, so you see the same guys on each PPV, and you only have 3 weeks in between. Way too much IMO. Not much of a debate here, but just give your thoughts on the PPV situation.
Is there too many? And if you think yes, should WWE go back to single brand PPV's, to justify having this many, or scale back?
Backlash-April 26th, 2009
Judgment Day- May 17th, 2009
Extreme Rules-June 7th, 2009
Great American Bash-June 28th, 2009
That's too much. That's 1 PPV every 3 weeks, from WM until Great American Bash. It goes further as well. But really, back in the day, when they had interpromotional PPV's (until mid 2003) there were a hell of a lot less PPV's. Then, when they did seperate brand PPV's, they made them as frequent as they are now. That's fine, I get it. Each brand had a seperate PPV set, so a guy on one show was really only on PPV once every 6 weeks. Now though, they do interpromotional PPV's every time, so you see the same guys on each PPV, and you only have 3 weeks in between. Way too much IMO. Not much of a debate here, but just give your thoughts on the PPV situation.
Is there too many? And if you think yes, should WWE go back to single brand PPV's, to justify having this many, or scale back?