Saying "we are Pepsi and they're Coke" would be the straightforward comparison to make. If it wasn't obvious, TK saying "we're Pepsi and they're Harvey Weinstein" is a quip. It's not a literal comparison. It's absurdity for comedic effect, and obviously a dig at the competitor.
It is obviously hyperbolic, but we also can't sit here and act like it hasn't been systemic sexual misconduct in WWE for 40 years, that has included numerous staff and wrestlers, not just Vince, that may have only just stopped happening within the last several months.
I think you can be critical of the creative choice to air the All In footage. I was against it. I always think in wrestling there are many different routes you can take to get to a desired outcome, so I still wouldn't say it was 100% necessary to air it. However, the results are already starting to speak for themselves, from a fan feedback perspective at least. Perry's AEW return has been met with heat that most people couldn't have anticipated. The attack on TK and his selling the neck during the NFL draft has gotten so many people talking. From my perspective, it's been an extremely fun angle spawned from that segment. Anyone is free to disagree, but anecdotally, I don't see many unbiased parties who aren't really enjoying the direction this has taken.