When have I ever said it's stupid to not push RVD and Hardy?
You probably got confused with the order of words so I will re-phrase: When have I ever complained about RVD and Hardy not getting immediate pushes.
When have I ever said it's stupid to not push RVD and Hardy?
When RVD and Jeff got signed I made it clear I didn't want them to shoot right into the main event scene. Too many rising talents like Wolfe, Pope, etc. that deserve to shine over guys we already know like Jeff and RVD. I would have been totally satisfied if RVD has nice non-title singles feud with someone...maybe Sting since he beat the shit out of him with a bat on his debut. So now what happens to Pope? How much deeper does Wolfe get buried down the ladder?
The fact that TNA is giving away big matches isn't what bothers me. I don't care if they're bad at business, that's not my problem. What bothers me is when RVD vs Jeff Hardy and RVD vs AJ Styles are given away without any substantial build-up. I would be just as irked if RVD vs AJ Styles was booked the Impact before a PPV without build-up, and then put on PPV. It's not the fact that it's free that hurts the quality (though there's an argument for that too); rather it's the fact that there was no reason to substantially care about that match, especially considering what it could have been.
.
Your main argument for giving away RVD vs Styles and RVD/Hardy was because of money. Those 2 are money players. RVD still has a big following. Jeff was arguably WWE's biggest draw in 09. They put 4 money attractors Monday. RVD vs Hardy, money. RVD vs Styles, money. RVD as champ, money. World title change on tv, money. What's the point in hiring big money guys if they aren't going to use them? So which is it? Should they care about money? Or should they push their money players to the side?
This is my main problem with it. Although I would have rather Dinero have won the title than RVD. It's all about the build-up. There was no build up to this at all. It's the reason why I hated Swagger winning the title, the reason I hated Sheamus winning the title. Where's the build up? You need to make people care about things like this. Build ups makes the lead in to matches better, the actual match better, the ending, the followup, the memories, build-up effects all of that.
Think about how much money they could have made if they built up a feud leading to the PPV.
This is my main problem with it. Although I would have rather Dinero have won the title than RVD. It's all about the build-up. There was no build up to this at all. It's the reason why I hated Swagger winning the title, the reason I hated Sheamus winning the title. Where's the build up? You need to make people care about things like this. Build ups makes the lead in to matches better, the actual match better, the ending, the followup, the memories, build-up effects all of that.
To be fair, there was some minor build up with Cena/Sheamus also, Swagger was a HEEL MITB winner. You shouldn't expect him to set up a match and build for it. Although, he could have held off until a later PPV to cash it in.