TNA ReACTION

[Montana]

What does everyone think of TNA getting a second show? I think they have a big enough Roster to make it work, however i think it could overflood the product. The storylines move fast enough with just the weekly show. What are your thoughts?

 

[straight_edge76]

Interesting question, I think that in theory it's a good idea being that some guys don't get enough (if any) air time on Impact and a secondary show could benefit them but at the same time TNA is already going fast enough, a second show would likely fuck that up even more.

Also we have seen what happens when a promotion that Bischoff is in a authority position gets a second show. :shifty:

 

[MizMasta3000]

I didn't know Xplosion still came on

 

[chessarmy]

They need it, the roster is so bloated it causes the shows to be rushed with 5000 different segments a week. With two shows, they get more time to use everyone so the quality of the product gets better.

 

[Montana]

Opps It's ReACTION! Can a mod change the title!



On Thursday, June 24, Spike TV will expand “TNA Thursdaysâ€￾ to three hours with the addition of “ReACTION.â€￾

“ReACTIONâ€￾ is a one-hour docu-series that will focus on the stories and characters of TNA Wrestling and preview the upcoming action-packed episode of “TNA iMPACT!â€￾ in a new format. The new show will kick off “TNA Thursdaysâ€￾ at 8:00 pm ET/PT (beginning June 24), and serve as the lead-in to “iMPACT!â€￾.

 

[NinoBrown]

I actually like the way ReAction is shot, the gritty documentary style footage.

 

[jerseyboybastard]

TNA doesn't need a 2nd show, they just need to cut away 1/3 of their roster. Wrestlers that have brought little to nothing to the table and proven that they're not going to draw ratings, buyrates or interest from casual wrestling fans. I'll leave it up to TNA to make the determination who fits that criteria.

 

[JurassicBonez]

I like the camera angle style that they use. That's the main thing that caught my attention. If done right, this show can take off the load of promos on Impact so they'll have more in ring action.

 

[Mike Chaos]

TNA doesn't need a 2nd show, they just need to cut away 1/3 of their roster. Wrestlers that have brought little to nothing to the table and proven that they're not going to draw ratings, buyrates or interest from casual wrestling fans. I'll leave it up to TNA to make the determination who fits that criteria.

I was just about to type my response to this thread when I seen jerseyboy already displayed my similar opinions on the topic.