Tna Bad Booking?

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
474
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
112
Location
PA, US
Back to the original question-It's because TNA DOES have poor booking, that so many people criticize it. They have done many things right as well, so it just frustrates people even more when they see shit booking, knowing that the whole promotion could be better.

Prime example-This past week on the two hour debut, after basically saying that pro wrestling was about to enter a "new era", all the hype all the buildup wondering what we were going to see as the first match for this "new era", and its...Dustin Rhodes vs. Rhyno. Not exactly the way to set the stage or get new fans. I didn't exactly think it was a BAD match, but there were SO many more possibilities. Poor booking IMO.
 

LKP

Guest
If tna had Paul heyman then id would be doing much much better. Fire russo now.
 

PeepShow

Guest
^Yep, and you just had to do that didnt you....lol. That was prolly the worst part of the show IMO. The first person to come out.....Silverdust. No, just no. Get him off my TV. But as Ive said, keep the spike :D Anyways, but yeah, then all the run ins at the end kinda made it even more bad. But it did get the Monsters Ball set up and going. Other than that, the show was great thoguh.

Meant for Flair for the Gold