You know for the longest time I have herd criticism from fans & websites about how horriable Tna's booking is. I have herd everything from "to many constant run ins" to "no direction" to "the x-division not being used right" blah, blah, blah. The point is do you think there right or wrong either way explain!:gathering:
Tna Bad Booking?
- Thread starter Matthew Edwards
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
PeepShow
Guest
I see all these threads daily. "TNA sucks" "Its not being used right"
SHUT THE FUCK UP.
I could make threads just like this about WWE. But they would get closed. You know why? b.c they fucking know I am right and hate to admit it. Remember about 3 months ago when there wer rumors of the Xdivision title being faised out? Yeah, well did it ever happen? Nope. And what ever happened to you precious CW title over on SD? Oh wait, it was faised out. Is there anyone bitching about that? No. You people just want to bash it and say it sucks, b/c you are afraid that a smaller company has a better product that you. And your response? "Look at the ratings" "Who has more money"
Hmmm :g: I wonder why? You be the judge.
SHUT THE FUCK UP.
I could make threads just like this about WWE. But they would get closed. You know why? b.c they fucking know I am right and hate to admit it. Remember about 3 months ago when there wer rumors of the Xdivision title being faised out? Yeah, well did it ever happen? Nope. And what ever happened to you precious CW title over on SD? Oh wait, it was faised out. Is there anyone bitching about that? No. You people just want to bash it and say it sucks, b/c you are afraid that a smaller company has a better product that you. And your response? "Look at the ratings" "Who has more money"
Hmmm :g: I wonder why? You be the judge.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,366
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
- Age
- 30
- Location
- Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
I made a thread like this months ago...
And please read any other threads that may concern your idea before you go making a new one...
And please read any other threads that may concern your idea before you go making a new one...
The Rated R CMStar
Guest
X Division is better than the CW division. Everybody knows it. That why it is a bigger deal when the X division gets blurred down than when the CW division gets buried.
Besides, the point is not that TNA has less ratings than Raw or Smackdown, or haves less money. The points is that TNA, having the starts they have, have less ratings that the highly bashed ECW. The point is that TNA can't be consider anymore a small company and use that as a shield to not getting profit, or being a let down on buyrates and ratings.
Besides, the point is not that TNA has less ratings than Raw or Smackdown, or haves less money. The points is that TNA, having the starts they have, have less ratings that the highly bashed ECW. The point is that TNA can't be consider anymore a small company and use that as a shield to not getting profit, or being a let down on buyrates and ratings.
I am not making complaints I am actually a fan of tna I was just worndering if ever body else felt the same way the critics do. I personally do not so chill out DICK. And just for the record. I have not watched wwe in 9 months so don't bring that shit up. And even if I was complaning which I'm not but if I was I would have a right to my beliefs. Because I HAVE ordered every ppv since day one . And ALMOST ever dvd they have put out. So go chill out or something!:fuyou_1:
PeepShow
Guest
O DANG!!!
Just to let you know, the "STFU", wasnt directly geared towards you, just to all the people in general who make these types of threads.
Anyways, if you were a true fan, who has watched it from day one, I could see that maybe you are a bit dissapointed. I started watching about 2 years ago when Cage came over. I had watched it a few times prior to that, but I still loved it. I know you may not like it, but whats the big deal other than them not having the guys you want. Its still a good show with what they do. Im just still baffled at what you guys think is so wrong.
Just to let you know, the "STFU", wasnt directly geared towards you, just to all the people in general who make these types of threads.
Anyways, if you were a true fan, who has watched it from day one, I could see that maybe you are a bit dissapointed. I started watching about 2 years ago when Cage came over. I had watched it a few times prior to that, but I still loved it. I know you may not like it, but whats the big deal other than them not having the guys you want. Its still a good show with what they do. Im just still baffled at what you guys think is so wrong.
TNA's booking does need to improve considering there was a disgraceful BTB award entitled, "Vince Russo of the Year Award." However, I am a fan of TNA, and hope by the end of the decade it will have washed up and dried out WWE. I don't think they need to improve on the moves of matches, promos, length of matches, etc., but they may need to work on choosing faces and heels correctly, instead of having matches where Team Pacman takes on two guys of the biggest heel faction in the wrestling world today.
LKP
Guest
phantomgerald
Guest
Peep, please please stop being such a sheep. WWE right now sucks and we all know it, but TNA isn't perfect either. No, they didn't phase the x division out, but they let Samoan Joe take it whenever he wants and that lowers the credibilty of it. The booking for TNA is bad and you know it. Having Daniels defeat the champion cleanly on TV when they have a title match on PPV? Just doesn't make sense to me. And with the talent in the tag division, the title match happens to be a champion who doesn't wrestle and a makeshift team of Styles and Tomlo (yes I said they were a makeshift team) just wastes the talent that they have. Where's MCMG's spot on the card?
PeepShow
Guest
1. Did I ever say it was? No. Stop putting words in my mouth. I just said its not as bad as everyone says. I mean, I hear flaws about WWE from time to time, but not near as much as TNA. It just doesnt make sense to me.
2. Wasnt that match like 2-3 months ago, before the match was even scheduled?
3. Its called bringing in money and ratings. And they cleary havent done that. So like I said, dont be suprised to see them lose and Pacman being canned after BGF.
4. I bet my bottom dollar that the MCMG will be in the "Fight for the Right" match. They wouldnt just not have them on the card. To me, that is the biggest problem with TNA, is the incorrect use of the MCMG. Just let it play out. Hopefully in a few months, they will see if, not, o well. There are biger things to worry about.
PeepShow
Guest
^ I dont give a fuck about money and ratings. Thats TNAs job. Ive said that. Its not my responsiblity to worry about that stuff. What you said kinda baffles me, b/c it really doesnt make sense. I guess its just me
PeepShow
Guest
^B/c Im adressing whaat sombody else said. Im just telling them why they are doing what they are doing. I think thats pretty self explanitory