Theory Getting His Name Back?, Backstage News on Theory’s WWE Push Under Triple H

[Sabretooth]

Ciampa not having his first name is what is holding him back

Not what I said. I said it does nothing for him. Read.

 

[Deezy]

Not what I said. I said it does nothing for him. Read.

You are just making a mountain out of a molehill....it's honestly embarrassing.

 

[Y2Jayne]

Great news. Sad Antonio Cesaro never got his first name back before he left.

 

[Sabretooth]

You are just making a mountain out of a molehill....it's honestly embarrassing.

No what’s embarrassing is that you use the “it’s not a big deal” excuse to counter every argument even though the simple fact is it’s an unnecessary change and I’m glad Hunter is reversing them.

 

[Deezy]

No what’s embarrassing is that you use the “it’s not a big deal” excuse to counter every argument even though the simple fact is it’s an unnecessary change and I’m glad Hunter is reversing them.

It's not a big deal....literally only halfwits with asperbergers make it a big deal.

 

[Sabretooth]

It's not a big deal....literally only halfwits with asperbergers make it a big deal.

Now that’s just mean

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Sure it’s not a “big deal” but something doesn’t have to be a big deal to be able to complain about it, or to not like it. If Sabs doesn’t like it, he can voice that all he wants.

Now counter point, Deezy can for sure freely voice he doesn’t see it as a big deal.

BUT stuff like the asperbergers comment could honestly not be said. Other than that y’all keep going.

 

[Buffy]

Nice to see that the stars is slowly getting their full name back one person at a time.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Presentation is a large part of what makes a wrestler work.

The idea that names don’t have any bearing is certainly an interesting take. Steve Austin would probably disagree with you.

 

[Sabretooth]

Presentation is a large part of what makes a wrestler work.

The idea that names don’t have any bearing is certainly an interesting take. Steve Austin would probably disagree with you.

Well I think Deezy’s argument is that it’s not that bad because he’s not changing their name to something completely different. He’s just subtracting a first or last name. And I agree… it’s not TERRIBLE but it’s still stupid and unnecessary.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Well I think Deezy’s argument is that it’s not that bad because he’s not changing their name to something completely different. He’s just subtracting a first or last name. And I agree… it’s not TERRIBLE but it’s still stupid and unnecessary.

I’m just talking about the name situation in general. Deezy usually says the same thing about situations where Pete Dunne is renamed Butch so I don’t think he really cares that much about the difference to be honest. But I agree Austin theory to just theory isn’t that big a deal but I do think just calling him Theory sounds kind of silly on paper and I can’t be the only one so it effects the presentation. At least a little bit.

 

[Sabretooth]

I’m just talking about the name situation in general. Deezy usually says the same thing about situations where Pete Dunne is renamed Butch so I don’t think he really cares that much about the difference to be honest. But I agree Austin theory to just theory isn’t that big a deal but I do think just calling him Theory sounds kind of silly on paper and I can’t be the only one so it effects the presentation. At least a little bit.

To me Tommaso Ciampa to Ciampa was worse. Ciampa by itself sounds so fucking weird and Tommaso was such a cool name.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

To me Tommaso Ciampa to Ciampa was worse. Ciampa by itself sounds so fucking weird and Tommaso was such a cool name.

That’s what I’m saying. Presentation is key.

 

[Sabretooth]

That’s what I’m saying. Presentation is key.

Exactly man. But Deezy doesn’t get it.

 

[Deezy]

How many times do I have to quote Shakespeare?

"what's in a name"? If a rose was called a turd, it wouldn't stop smelling like a rose.

A rose can grow out of everything, A rose is a rose so it rose above it.