- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 14,732
- Reaction score
- 10,647
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Townsville, Queensland, Australia
*Hands Brother Seth a Vomit Bag*
No Thanks...I watch fighting...not partake in it...
The War of the Horsewomen...
- Thread starter Grievous 3D
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
Charlotte and Ronda are already in WWE, those are the only two that matter.
Charlotte vs. Ronda at WrestleMania needs to happen. Fuck the rest of them.
Charlotte vs. Ronda at WrestleMania needs to happen. Fuck the rest of them.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 14,732
- Reaction score
- 10,647
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Townsville, Queensland, Australia
All the MMA woman would beat the shit out of the WWE horsewoman. So some people will get upset that woman from the UFC come over and beat up the professional wrestlers.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 14,732
- Reaction score
- 10,647
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 42
- Location
- Townsville, Queensland, Australia
Well yeah...but just because they can doesn't mean we want to see it.
I mean I'm sure Ronda could have put Stephanie in the hospital with
one punch...but that wouldn't have been very entertaining would it?
:emoji_thinking:
Actually...I would have been okay with that.
Yeah if we wanted to watch woman actually fight each other, we wouldn't be watching WWE.
You are right we could watch women fighting compilations on YouTube instead, lol.
I'm not super worried about the MMA Horsewomen taking over the WWE Women's division, I kinda feel like most of them will fall to the wayside like most of the roster after they get their Horsewoman vs. Horsewoman match up. Maybe this is just my MMA ignorance talking but I'm pretty sure Ronda's the only one who has an mainstream appeal to her. At the very least, I think I've knew of Ronda before her first Mania appearance, I read skim the article five minutes ago and I've already forgotten the names of the other two. The others will get push via association but I can't see WWE maintaining interest once they get their marquee match in. Then again, maybe the other two end up being really talented and connect with the fans to warrant a push? I don't know, they're blank slates as far as wrestling goes. I feel if they debut these two as part of the faction, there chances of success afterwards are going to be diminished. Baszler will probably be fine since she's been thoroughly established as a presence throughout the MYC & NXT but if the other two are just introduced as vestiges to allow the Eight Horsewomen clash then there's not going to be much to connect to them personally. So, I kinda hope it goes this way because I'd rather not have a lot of the top spots in the division reserved for MMA personalities. But either way, a select handful of the women we see today will still be fine regardless, Charlotte especially has nothing to worry about.
As for any booking ideas, I'd just save it for WrestleMania 36. You could definitely have it at Survivor Series this year to help lead-in to Charlotte vs. Ronda (in which case, I'd have the MMA'ers win because I'd rather Charlotte win at Mania) and having the Eight Horsewoman clash at Survivor Series match since due to the multi-tag stipulation of the event and as a way to help make Survivor Series feel like a Big Four event but whilst I'm not opposed to that idea, I think it's a lot more effective if you save it for Mania 36. I mean, the other two have *just* started at the performance center? I don't want them being rushed out for a big match so soon. Even though I kinda want WWE to book the other two in a position that will render them ineffective as individuals, if I was trying to book the match properly, I would want to have them wrestling on their own (maybe in a tag team, if the women's tag division ends up existing) so that fans could potentially latch on to them as performers, rather than only caring about their inclusion because they're attached to Ronda. The match will be a lot better if your audience cares about more than half the participants. On that note, damage control needs to be taken for the other Horsewoman too. Bayley especially. So given WWE more time to do that can only be a good thing (admittedly, they likely wouldn't start re-building them up until like, a few months before the match is set to take place but at the very least the more time removed from the Bayley/Bliss feud the better). And WWE really seems to like having WrestleMania carry continuing narratives in their match selection. I like to think this happened as a result of how excellent the Taker/Shawn/Trips essentially four-year narrative turned out, but for their big matches it's seem to be a continuing trend. I mean, Brock/Roman at WrestleMania 34 was the next chapter of story that basically began at WrestleMania XXX and sans 32, every Mania since they contributed to it (not that WWE played up to it much mind you in the build to 34, ultimately they decided it was a better call to have Roman parrot the cries of the IWC about Lesnar in a blatant attempt to try and get him over [which to be honest, playing up the fact that these two men are the only to be Undertaker at Mania probably would've angered the fans more so I guess fair call). So I think having Charlotte/Ronda main event WrestleMania 35, and then at WrestleMania 36 have the Eight Horsewomen tag, fits nicely within that trend. And with WrestleMania 34, that could be a three narrative almost self-contained narrative at WrestleMania and I actually do think that's cool. Really makes WrestleMania feels special from the other PPV's when you can watch it in chronological order and get a real sense of story progression (though they should've abandoned both Rock/Cena and Brock/Roman imo but the concept of it is cool). Assuming Ronda wins at 35, I'd have WWE Horsewoman win at 36. Assuming Charlotte wins at 35, I'd still have WWE Horsewoman win at 36.
But I don't honestly care that much about it, I just like fantasy booking stuff. It falls under the realm of "It kinda needs to happen, it'll be a big deal so I'll probably watch it, but I'm not really looking forward to it or invested in it".
As for any booking ideas, I'd just save it for WrestleMania 36. You could definitely have it at Survivor Series this year to help lead-in to Charlotte vs. Ronda (in which case, I'd have the MMA'ers win because I'd rather Charlotte win at Mania) and having the Eight Horsewoman clash at Survivor Series match since due to the multi-tag stipulation of the event and as a way to help make Survivor Series feel like a Big Four event but whilst I'm not opposed to that idea, I think it's a lot more effective if you save it for Mania 36. I mean, the other two have *just* started at the performance center? I don't want them being rushed out for a big match so soon. Even though I kinda want WWE to book the other two in a position that will render them ineffective as individuals, if I was trying to book the match properly, I would want to have them wrestling on their own (maybe in a tag team, if the women's tag division ends up existing) so that fans could potentially latch on to them as performers, rather than only caring about their inclusion because they're attached to Ronda. The match will be a lot better if your audience cares about more than half the participants. On that note, damage control needs to be taken for the other Horsewoman too. Bayley especially. So given WWE more time to do that can only be a good thing (admittedly, they likely wouldn't start re-building them up until like, a few months before the match is set to take place but at the very least the more time removed from the Bayley/Bliss feud the better). And WWE really seems to like having WrestleMania carry continuing narratives in their match selection. I like to think this happened as a result of how excellent the Taker/Shawn/Trips essentially four-year narrative turned out, but for their big matches it's seem to be a continuing trend. I mean, Brock/Roman at WrestleMania 34 was the next chapter of story that basically began at WrestleMania XXX and sans 32, every Mania since they contributed to it (not that WWE played up to it much mind you in the build to 34, ultimately they decided it was a better call to have Roman parrot the cries of the IWC about Lesnar in a blatant attempt to try and get him over [which to be honest, playing up the fact that these two men are the only to be Undertaker at Mania probably would've angered the fans more so I guess fair call). So I think having Charlotte/Ronda main event WrestleMania 35, and then at WrestleMania 36 have the Eight Horsewomen tag, fits nicely within that trend. And with WrestleMania 34, that could be a three narrative almost self-contained narrative at WrestleMania and I actually do think that's cool. Really makes WrestleMania feels special from the other PPV's when you can watch it in chronological order and get a real sense of story progression (though they should've abandoned both Rock/Cena and Brock/Roman imo but the concept of it is cool). Assuming Ronda wins at 35, I'd have WWE Horsewoman win at 36. Assuming Charlotte wins at 35, I'd still have WWE Horsewoman win at 36.
But I don't honestly care that much about it, I just like fantasy booking stuff. It falls under the realm of "It kinda needs to happen, it'll be a big deal so I'll probably watch it, but I'm not really looking forward to it or invested in it".
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2017
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 1,078
- Points
- 93
More like horsewarmen!
Or warhorsewomen. Or "Four talented MMA stars that killed Sonya Deville's gimmick" vs. Charlotte. Full stop. Nobody else is needed. Just Charlotte.
Or warhorsewomen. Or "Four talented MMA stars that killed Sonya Deville's gimmick" vs. Charlotte. Full stop. Nobody else is needed. Just Charlotte.