The Undertaker Will Be Kept Off TV Until WM?

[KITT]

AA is a powerful move, doe. 2:

Terrible argument. The tombstone is Taker dropping to his knees and safely setting a guy on his back. Powerful move!

 

[Prince Bálor]

Terrible argument. The tombstone is Taker dropping to his knees and safely setting a guy on his back. Powerful move!

Both are powerful moves!

 

[Roadster]

Terrible argument. The tombstone is Taker dropping to his knees and safely setting a guy on his back. Powerful move!

At least in the world of kayfabe that is an easy enough way to present a knockout move. A Fireman's Carry Slam can't and never will seem like it can knock out guys for more than 10 seconds.

 

[The GOAT]

Bray Wyatt can't survive 1 AA but he can survive 3 Tombstones? lol.

No, he can survive two Tombstones. The third would be the one to keep him down.

And wrestling is full of all kinds of inconsistencies like these. It's sort of futile to start poking holes in this sort of thing now.

 

[KITT]

No, he can survive two Tombstones. The third would be the one to keep him down.

And wrestling is full of all kinds of inconsistencies like these. It's sort of futile to start poking holes in this sort of thing now.

Hey now, don't take an Internet wrestling fan's ability to over analyze wrestling.

 

[Roadster]

No, he can survive two Tombstones. The third would be the one to keep him down.

And wrestling is full of all kinds of inconsistencies like these. It's sort of futile to start poking holes in this sort of thing now.

I understand that wrestling is full of this much like how CM Punk's 2014 elimination by an already eliminated Kane counted while HBK's in 1996 didn't when he was eliminated by an already eliminated Vader. I was just poking fun that when their match at WrestleMania is to happen, it almost bound in stone that more than 1 Tombstone is need to put away Bray.

In my opinion, The Undertaker's tombstone used to put away people far more convincingly back in his early days as The Undertaker (Not exactly sure if he used it in CWA as The Undertaker). After his matches with Shawn Michaels and Triple H (For reasons probably already known) having everyone kicking out is kind of a cheap pop to make a match good like The Undertaker vs. Brock Lesnar. HBK and HHH were to only ones who didn't need to false finishes to seem good.

Hey now, don't take an Internet wrestling fan's ability to over analyze wrestling.

So much blueberry in such a small post.

 

[KITT]

Ouch! I shan't ever recover!

 

[Butters!]

It's for the best in my honest opinion. What good will it do? Ever since the streak has ended, The Undertaker (As Cruel as this is going to sound) has no real relevance to the WWE.
Although one appearance on raw would be grand for a promo/segment, it still wouldn't do him any justice. Although i'll take anything that has Bray Wyatt doing more promo's. <3

 

[Roadster]

It's for the best in my honest opinion. What good will it do? Ever since the streak has ended, The Undertaker (As Cruel as this is going to sound) has no real relevance to the WWE.
Although one appearance on raw would be grand for a promo/segment, it still wouldn't do him any justice. Although i'll take anything that has Bray Wyatt doing more promo's. <3

stpid ovr analzing intrnt smart smark mark! jk

I do agree with what you're saying though.

 

[KITT]

Undertaker's relevance lives and dies by two schmoes' minority opinion as opposed to the millions of fans around the globe more than happy to see him.

 

[Butters!]

Undertaker's relevance lives and dies by two schmoes' minority opinion as opposed to the millions of fans around the globe more than happy to see him.

Ouch. I never stated i wouldn't be happy to see him, I just feel it wouldn't be best for the storyline.

 

[KITT]

Ouch. I never stated i wouldn't be happy to see him, I just feel it wouldn't be best for the storyline.

Haha my bad, dude.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Undertaker's relevance lives and dies by two schmoes' minority opinion as opposed to the millions of fans around the globe more than happy to see him.

To hell with Taker's well-being. Gotta lure in those new Network subscribers! But hey, the fans will be happy to see him, so all's good. :bodallas:

 

[KITT]

To hell with Taker's well-being. Gotta lure in those new Network subscribers! But hey, the fans will be happy to see him, so all's good. :bodallas:

His well being?C'mon, he is a much better judge of that than you or I. One match a year is fine.

Saying he should have quit after 28 astounds me. I'm very vocal about not being a fan of Punk, but 29 was the best Mania match Taker has had since retiring Shawn.

I don't buy the ambulance story from last year. That's kayfabe.

 

[Danielson]

Taker should wrestle as American badass taker against rusev and classic taker vs bray. :umad: