The Rock got the biggest pop in wrestling history.

[Ricky Smarks]

A subjective poll from a forum that has less than 5,000 members doesn’t disprove objective audio levels nor does it cure your hearing deficiency.

I can make a poll on this website asking members who had more ratings victories head to head in 1999, Rock or Austin.

And I’d guarantee you Austin would win, yet objectively Rock had more:





Since you’re not well skilled in debate and rather novice, let me point out what your fallacy here is:

Your claims have therefore been rendered null and void... and therefore refuted.

This is the most laughably absurd thing I've ever read. Don't listen to everyone else, but listen to me because I am objectively right.

You're also one of the worst debaters I've ever seen. Denying straight facts when presented to you and when someone with credibility refutes your argument, you just say they're a lair like that somehow makes you right and your argument better so you shouldn't be talking about anyone's debate skills.

The point of the poll is to show you how arbitrary and subjective this topic was, but you don't understand the difference so it goes right over your head.

And if we take your thread at face value, you tried to claim one pop was loudest based on how you heard it, so asking others to lsiten to pops and vote on what's the loudest isn't a simple appeal to popularity. It's asking them to judge things they hear for themselves and making a judgment.

It's the same thing as the ratings argument because most people voting wouldn't be voting with the knowledge needed for something that has concrete facts to support an argument of that nature where as someone voting in this poll only needs to listen to the actual pops provided in this thread.

 

[RLStern]

This is the most laughably absurd thing I've ever read. Don't listen to everyone else, but listen to me because I am objectively right.

You're also one of the worst debaters I've ever seen. Denying straight facts when presented to you and when someone with credibility refutes your argument, you just say they're a lair like that somehow makes you right and your argument better so you shouldn't be telling anyone about their debate skills.

The point of the poll is to show you how arbitrary and subjective this topic was, but you don't understand the difference so it goes right over your head.

And if we take your thread at face value, you tried to claim one pop was loudest based on how you heard it, so asking others to lsiten to pops and vote on what's the loudest isn't a simple appeal to popularity. It's asking them to judge things they hear for themselves and making a judgment.

It's the same thing as the ratings argument because most people voting wouldn't be voting with the knowledge needed for something that has concrete facts to support an argument of that nature where as someone voting in this poll only needs to listen to the actual pops provided in this thread.

Numbers are numbers, science is science, facts are facts, objectives ain’t changed by subjectives.

A poll ain’t changing that, it’s called an appeal to popularity fallacy.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

@The Great One @Deezy @Juice

Nope. I'm already out.

There's no debate here. If you think Rock's pop was louder than Hogan's, that's what you think. We can't actually argue that point.

And don't forget as always...

I'll catch you later in another thread. Goodbye.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Numbers are numbers, science is science, facts are facts, objectives ain’t changed by subjectives.

A poll ain’t changing that, it’s called an appeal to popularity fallacy.

There are no numbers in your opinion what's louder, dambass.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

A poll ain’t changing that, it’s called an appeal to popularity fallacy.

And I already destroyed this lie. So good luck next time. Peace.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

@RLStern don't make threads if you won't accept others opinions. That's the point in a thread like this.

 

[RLStern]

Nope. I'm already out.

There are no numbers in your opinion what's louder, dambass.

Insults not nice I didn’t insult you...

but if you wanna leave the thread, see ya then,

Who else wants some?

 

[Deezy]

 

[Ricky Smarks]

I'm not gonna let you lie. Also, I did that on purpose. Calling you a dumbass would be out of line.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Is better.

 

[RLStern]

Is better.

This is better, you don’t gotta click it:

 

[Ricky Smarks]

This is better, you don’t gotta click it:

That's why I added this one. Also, a great gif.

 

[Shane]

How loud a pop is is an opinion you fucking idiot. We all know you have a hard on for Rock so of course you’re going to grab one of his pops and say it was the loudest. But now you can say your ears work better than ours right

 

[Ricky Smarks]

Insults not nice I didn’t insult you...

Why do you edit your posts like 2-4 minutes later?

You said I didn't know how to debate, that's insulting, and I changed the spelling on purpose so it's not even a real word.

The way in which you respond sometimes irritates me. Apologies, nonetheless. I'm sorry. We'll go our separate ways in this chat now.

 

[Ricky Smarks]

How loud a pop is is an opinion you fucking idiot. We all know you have a hard on for Rock so of course you’re going to grab one of his pops and say it was the loudest. But now you can say your ears work better than ours right

This is an insult, keep it classy, but also he's right. About everything else.