The Iranian people chanting 'death to America' and crying because a sack of shit person was killed, I mean, really? You've gotta wonder how fucking looney these people are. Disturbing.
The War Powers Act requires the president to consult with Congress before carrying out any military strikes overseas.
He didn't.
The president is in violation of the War Powers Act and Congress has an obligation to reassert its authority. I get it him doing it was for a purpose, but the dude continues to say fuck with the rules and isn't it interesting he does this when he has his Impeachment going on. Almost like he did it to try and try to ease the problems with that so he can get praise for what he did?
He probably thinks war will get him reelected
When it’s the law.. yeah. Aren’t laws suppose to be followed? Or is that only certain laws?
What law was broken? Yes Laws are supposed to be followed but you know, most get swept under the rug. Even when they are brought to light. Why do you think Nancy Pelosi is not wanting to turn over documents on Impeachment over the the Senate? Better question, why did she never want to even go through with this? Peer Pressure is a hell of a thing.
Sounds like he's still on Ukraine.Was it legal for the U.S. to kill Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani?
Analysis: The U.S. government justified the strike as an act of self-defense, but a top U.N. official questioned the operation in a series of tweets.www.nbcnews.com
Now, I know you'll probably tear part the news source, or say fake news. But It talks about what law might have been broken here.
Was it legal for the U.S. to kill Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani?
Analysis: The U.S. government justified the strike as an act of self-defense, but a top U.N. official questioned the operation in a series of tweets.www.nbcnews.com
Now, I know you'll probably tear part the news source, or say fake news. But It talks about what law might have been broken here.
See my above response to Hoho. About The whole Article 2 Section II thingy. Eminent attacks and all. Especially after one of our Embassies was attacked.
So yeah, if the Intel is there and Trump was listening to his advisers, the media can keep with their narrative.
This is far from World War 3. People said the same after we droned Syria too.
Blaze is gettin' it now.
You do that alot.I decided to not detect the sarcasm.
good one.See my above response to Hoho. About The whole Article 2 Section II thingy. Eminent attacks and all. Especially after one of our Embassies was attacked.
So yeah, if the Intel is there and Trump was listening to his advisers, the media can keep with their narrative.
This is far from World War 3. People said the same after we droned Syria too.
I decided to not detect the sarcasm.