- Joined
- May 21, 2011
- Messages
- 25,324
- Reaction score
- 813
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 46
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-
- Favorite Wrestler
-

Alright, as some of you already know, I've never been a huge fan of this particular style of match. Generally I think it doesn't allow for the type of story-telling that I like to see in my wrestling matches. Of course I'm willing to admit that some have been great over the years, but on average I find I'd much rather watch a good old singles, cage or even Falls Count Anywhere match than them. However, I was just reading an interview with Bret Hart and came across this quote....
Clearly it seems that Bret may still be a little bitter about Vince stealing the ladder match idea from him even though he didn't really create it. Besides that, he also seems to think the match itself transcends the performers in the ring. I ask you, is that truly the case or is the match made by the individuals involved?Bret Hart via 411 Mania said:"They had a great match at WrestleMania X but it wasn't the wrestlers that were great, it was the match that was great".
Personally I think it's a lot more of the second, since certain wrestlers are just better at working their psychology into the ladder match itself. I'm pretty sure no three tag teams could have pulled off the ladder portion of TLC II like the Dudleys, Hardy's and E &C could. At the same time, I have a hard time believing anyone in 1995 could have done a better job than Ramon and Michaels in their second one at Summerslam.