The people who say Xbox is better than PS3 are those who just can't get enough of the same first person shooter being released over and over and over again, and who's entire judging of the game comes from how well it plays online.
I made this argument in the last thread, but I will say it again. Online play does NOT decide if your game is good or not. You need a solid, lengthy and entertaining Campaign mode FIRST. Replayability of that campaign mode SECOND. Local multipliplayer options THIRD. And online content LAST.
This is what Microsoft fanboys don't understand, nay, what they REFUSE to understand. Is that good gameplay comes first, online play comes last. Xbox users cling to how their online servers are better, and whenever you want to talk about game sales they instantly go to "Halohalohalohalohalohalo" and don't mention anything else. So does that beat to an XBot that I can say that the PS3 version of every game in existence can outsell the Xbox's version of the game and they STILL would consider Xbox king because it has Halo? Fanboy Bullshit.
PS3 has superior blueray technology. Which fits lightyears more space and game capability for their exclusives. Hell, graphics and content need to be dumbed DOWN for the Xbox and Wii to be included in the making of a game. If PS3 has more exlusives, the quality in gameplay, graphics, content & overall enjoyment of the game would be a no contest against Microsoft.
They have less technical problems, better technology, cheaper internet (free in fact), More hard drive space, which is actually a HARD DRIVE instead of a giant memory card that passes off as a hard drive. And yet with all their superior product, they STILL manage to keep the prices reasonably close to the Xbox 360. After all, if Sony found a way to make the PS3 cheaper than the XBox, you can't tell me with a straight face that you would honestly buy the Xbox with it's older disk technology over the super advanced bluray capabilities and drive space of PS3 at a cheaper price.
That's the only reason Microsoft is still even in this debate. Because they have a cheap system, made of cheap materials, cheaply manufactured with cheap developers that just make the same exclusive over and over again and make sales just off of brand name value > content.