STREAK vs STREAK

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


fuzzy

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
467
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
26
I was wondering what do you guys think and which do you concider being more memorible when it's all said and done.....

The Undertaker's WM streak of 19? or Goldberg's winning streak of 173?

For me, it would have to the undertaker's WM streak, because it's something that has continued over all these yers and the wrestles that had has faced to keep the streak going.
 

Luke Flywalker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
2,484
Reaction score
49
Points
48
Age
37
Location
Guitarway To Heaven
Favorite Wrestler
paige
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
machoman
Favorite Wrestler
stonecold
Favorite Wrestler
wyattfamily
Favorite Wrestler
danielbryan2
Undertaker by far. To go 19-0 on the biggest wrestling event of the year... to defeat some of the names he has defeated: Snuka, Diesel, Sid, Kane x2, Triple H x2, Ric Flair, Big Show, Orton, Batista, Edge, HBK x2... that's just unbelievable! And while some of the matches were pretty dull... Undertaker has put on some classics on the show... true classics... Goldberg's streak lasted under 2 years if I'm not mistaken... sure it was 173 damn matches but... 19 on the biggest stage!?
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
2,923
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
41
Location
Badstreet, USA
Ummm...Taker's streak was actually legit. Sometimes WCW would add too many numbers to the streak, like it would be at 105 on Thunder, then at 111 the following Monday on Nitro, so they were insinuating Goldberg wrestled 6 times in three days, it was ludicrous. Plus Goldberg only had two really passable matches in that entire span, the one against Sting on Nitro where Sting put on his work boots for apparently the last time in his career and the DDP Halloween Havoc match that people didn't get to see on the PPV since they ran out of time and they put it on Nitro the following night. In all seriousness, and there is actual #s to support this, Taker's last 5 Mania's really trump Goldberg's entire career.
 

fuzzy

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
467
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
26
Taker even though isn't anywhere near 173 wins straight, his streak of 19-0 thus far in the time that has taken him to get here, does stand out a lot more and imo will be concidered a much bigger streak to have or to achive than what goldbreg had done in wcw.
 

1chiban

Active Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Age
35
Location
UK
Undertaker is a legend. Goldberg was effectively something of a flash in the pan. Granted some of that as down to WCW screwing up the way they booked him (I'm talking Nash beating him at Starrcade and, later, his awful heel turn), some of it was down to his limitations in-ring. His WWE run was okay until the E' made a baffling booking decision when he didn't win the Chamber match at that Summerslam and then they had Trips destroy him with the hammer afterwards. Killed his killer character completely.