Storylines or Wrestling?

[#HEEL__SRV9010]

I would chose Wrestling. As @deth said, a match can be epic without a storyline. Example:- CM Punk vs Jericho on RAW. It was 2 weeks after Rumble. Though they had history during the lead up to Mania, this match didn't have much storyline.

 

[Dat Kid1]

If I had to choose one over the other...damn I don't think I can. If it was like that I think I wouldn't be watching wrestling :haha: Wrestling by itself is fine and dandy, but if the storylines suck, I don't think I would be able to watch because it would just get boring after a while. I think I could tolerate not having a storyline more because then it just becomes a good TV show with really bad fight scenes. I guess the storyline aspect is more important to me. For example McMahon/Austin was more storyline than wrestling. We all know McMahon can't wrestle, but I think it was the build up that led to the match was what sold that entire feud and it's one of the best feuds I can remember.

Lolz I just made up my mind. Storylines > Wrestling

 

[PSachkovsky]

To be honest, it mostly depends on the wrestlers involved. If they are the type of wrestlers that can pull of a 5 star match in any show, than hell, I will prefer their wrestling ability than rather their storyline promos. But if the wrestlers aren't good enough, than I would be interested to see what they can deliver on the mic and how they can build up a feud.

 

[Pop Tatari]

I watch wrestling for wrestling thats what it should be about not love triangles etc.

 

[GeeTeaIye]

If you guys want just wrestling than go watch Wrasslin matches.

 

[Pop Tatari]

If you guys want storylines go to the cinema.

 

[Leo C]

In wrestling I think both are necessary, hard to say, don't think I can pick one. We're supposed to be watching a perfect combination of them.