Someone fantasy book Brock vs DB for me please

[Prince Bálor]

Reigns is a bit more believable but to be honest there's still a difference there between the two.. if they do decide to book it as DB vs Lesnar they are going to have a hard time selling that one.. I just hope WWE isn't stupid enough to have it to where DB makes Lesnar tap because that would just be absolutely ridiculous.

If Bryan/Lesnar ends up happening, there's no way they'll let Lesnar tap out.

They'll prolly have Lesnar go down to 3-5 Busaiku Knee Kicks/Knee Plus.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

If Bryan/Lesnar ends up happening, there's no way they'll let Lesnar tap out.

They'll prolly have Lesnar go down to 3-5 Busaiku Knee Kicks/Knee Plus.

I'm cringing already at this idea. so bad. I'm sure that's how it would finish as well.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

I would rather he win with a small package or something frankly.

 

[CM Punk]

Imagine Brock putting Daniel Bryan in a kimura lock tho.

I would rather he win with a small package or something frankly.

Disrespect. You want Brock, the guy who conquered the streak and John Cena to lose by a small package?
I'd rather he not win at all cause no one is gaining anything out of him beating Lesnar.
Reigns is gaining something. Rollins is gaining something. Ambrose is gaining something. Daniel Bryan isn't gaining anything.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Doesn't matter how long he was gone. He's still stealing the spotlight off people who worked that entire year. Same with Bryan if they decide to make him champion. With Reigns at least they made him appear via satellite.

Plus they had him pencilled in to win forever and didn't even have plan for Bryan even returning. It'd be a dumb move to have plans change for a guy who is already developed as a star than knocking three birds with one stone. (Reigns, Rollins and Ambrose)

I get the point.

But Bryan was injured and didn't have a proper title reign, this may be a lame excuse, but I just love DB. Also, they may feel like they owe the guy by having him compete for the title again, I have nothing against that... While it may be a slap in the face to those who've worked their asses off the entire year.
So, if Bryan wins the title and has it stolen from him again by Rollins cashing in on him, then he won't have a proper reign once again, till like the SummerSlam season where he regains it.

I don't hate Reigns, really. I just think it's a bit early to push the guy.

If it helps, I'm always up for the not-so-predictable outcomes... As in having Ambrose or Ziggler win the Rumble.

But we'll see how it goes. Plans do change after all.

 

[CM Punk]

I get the point.

But Bryan was injured and didn't have a proper title reign, this may be a lame excuse, but I just love DB. Also, they may feel like they owe the guy by having him compete for the title again, I have nothing against that... While it may be a slap in the face to those who've worked their asses off the entire year.
So, if Bryan wins the title and has it stolen from him again by Rollins cashing in on him, then he won't have a proper reign once again, till like the SummerSlam season where he regains it.

I don't hate Reigns, really. I just think it's a bit early to push the guy.

If it helps, I'm always up for the not-so-predictable outcomes... As in having Ambrose or Ziggler win the Rumble.

But we'll see how it goes. Plans do change after all.

As you said, lame excuse.:4/10:
Cena had to forfeit the title due to injury in 2007, but he didn't get the title back until the end of 2008. Nearly 11 months after he returned.
Reigns is not ready is just your opinion. Some of us think he's ready, HHH thinks he's ready, Vince Russo thinks he's ready, so your opinion doesn't really hold up to theirs.
As I said, Daniel Bryan isn't gaining anything out of the win, but Reigns would be. And if Reigns would gain something, automatically you can assume so would Ambrose and Rollins. If Daniel Bryan wins, only Seth Rollins gains something.

 

[Prince Bálor]

I'm cringing already at this idea. so bad. I'm sure that's how it would finish as well.

Don't see it happening any other way, honestly. I'm fine with it.

Same thing would've happened if Ziggler or Ambrose were in that situation. They aren't huge guys by any means, so if we're bringing in that whole 'believable' factor... Ziggler would prolly hit 5 Super kicks and 3-5 Zig Zags to put The Beast down. Ambrose would finish him off with like 5 Dirty Deeds if he were to face Bork.

However, Reigns who is a 'believable' opponent would take the beast down with like 5 Superman punches and 3 spears.

Would you cringe at those ideas?

 

[CM Punk]

Don't see it happening any other way, honestly. I'm fine with it.

Same thing would've happened if Ziggler or Ambrose were in that situation. They aren't huge guys by any means, so if we're bringing in that whole 'believable' factor... Ziggler would prolly hit 5 Super kicks and 3-5 Zig Zags to put The Beast down. Ambrose would finish him off with like 5 Dirty Deeds if he were to face Bork.

However, Reigns who is a 'believable' opponent would take the beast down with like 5 Superman punches and 3 spears.

Would you cringe at those ideas?

It'd take Reigns two spears since that move has been so protected. I don't know about Superman punch. Maybe one since he does it only when he does the spear.
So one set up spear and one surprise spear.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Don't see it happening any other way, honestly. I'm fine with it.

Same thing would've happened if Ziggler or Ambrose were in that situation. They aren't huge guys by any means, so if we're bringing in that whole 'believable' factor... Ziggler would prolly hit 5 Super kicks and 3-5 Zig Zags to put The Beast down. Ambrose would finish him off with like 5 Dirty Deeds if he were to face Bork.

However, Reigns who is a 'believable' opponent would take the beast down with like 5 Superman punches and 3 spears.

Would you cringe at those ideas?

Ziggler going over Brock lol. such a farfetched idea I can't even give an opinion on it.

 

[Prince Bálor]

As you said, lame excuse.:4/10:
Cena had to forfeit the title due to injury in 2007, but he didn't get the title back until the end of 2008. Nearly 11 months after he returned.
Reigns is not ready is just your opinion. Some of us think he's ready, HHH thinks he's ready, Vince Russo thinks he's ready, so your opinion doesn't really hold up to theirs.
As I said, Daniel Bryan isn't gaining anything out of the win, but Reigns would be. And if Reigns would gain something, automatically you can assume so would Ambrose and Rollins. If Daniel Bryan wins, only Seth Rollins gains something.

Sorreh, I'm a DB mark.

Well, damn. They'd better let Bryan have a proper title reign, if my scenario of him winning the title at Mania and then feuding with Rollins doesn't play out.

So, let's say with Reigns winning the title at Mania, but Rollins still cashing in on him, and Ambrose defeating Rollins earlier that night would somehow lead to the former Shield feud. Guess that'd be cool.

We'll see how it all goes, though.

 

[Just Kevin]

Lesnar vs Bryan vs Reigns triple threat would be the only conceivable way that Bryan would win while in a match with Lesnar.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Ziggler going over Brock lol. such a farfetched idea I can't even give an opinion on it.

But you would still love it, I suppose, as much as I would, 'cause we love the guy. Even though it's not believable enough.

 

[Prince Bálor]

It'd take Reigns two spears since that move has been so protected. I don't know about Superman punch. Maybe one since he does it only when he does the spear.
So one set up spear and one surprise spear.

I'd say more Superman punches and Spears.

They're gonna protect Brock. They're not gonna let him just go down after so little damage done to him, imo.

Cena had to hit 4 AA's but still couldn't win, Reigns may have to hit at least 2 of SP and like 3 Spears, or maybe I'm just overthinking stuff.

 

[CM Punk]

Sorreh, I'm a DB mark.

Well, damn. They'd better let Bryan have a proper title reign, if my scenario of him winning the title at Mania and then feuding with Rollins doesn't play out.

So, let's say with Reigns winning the title at Mania, but Rollins still cashing in on him, and Ambrose defeating Rollins earlier that night would somehow lead to the former Shield feud. Guess that'd be cool.

We'll see how it all goes, though.

Nah. They'd have Reigns win and let him have his Mania moment and since the night after Mania is always memorable, that's when they'd have Rollins cash in.

I'd say more Superman punches and Spears.

They're gonna protect Brock. They're not gonna let him just go down after so little damage done to him, imo.

Cena had to hit 4 AA's but still couldn't win, Reigns may have to hit at least 2 of SP and like 3 Spears, or maybe I'm just overthinking stuff.

Reigns is more protected than Cena. You may be right on three spears though.

 

[Prince Bálor]

Nah. They'd have Reigns win and let him have his Mania moment and since the night after Mania is always memorable, that's when they'd have Rollins cash in.

Reigns is more protected than Cena. You may be right on three spears though.

- There are a lot of scenarios, really. Still, would be nice if my fantasy-booking comes true and have Rollins cash in on the new champ at Mania, either Reigns/Bryan. I'd love it 'cause it's never been done before. I've said this a bazillion times. But, to each his own, though.

- Or maybe Reigns ends up Spearing Cena multiple times at Mania. You never know, plans do change and you can never count CENAWINSLOL out. But, let's just not go there.

If D-Bry doesn't win the Rumble and doesn't go on to headline WM 31 after all, then I'll be cool with Bryan conquering Rusev. That's the least they could do.