My friend told me to put it.
Ryder vs Tyson Kidd
Kinda the same situation to be honest. Zack has more of a character but put the two in the ring and Kidd is gonna make Ryder look like a joke.
My friend told me to put it.
Ryder vs Tyson Kidd
Kinda the same situation to be honest. Zack has more of a character but put the two in the ring and Kidd is gonna make Ryder look like a joke.
Since when does one worker being a better in ring wrestler mean he is going to make the other guy look like a joke? dafuq @ this logic
I approach it from an in ring standpoint. I'm a whore for ring work.
I understood that part. I don't understand how one worker being great and the other less so means the lesser worker is going to 'get embarrassed'. In most cases the superior worker will carry the lesser talent to a better match than they would otherwise have. If one guy is working his style and a guy like Kidd or Neville does theres and it happens to includes some cool moves, it doesn't mean the Ryder of this hypothetical scenario is being embarrassed or made to look bad.
Also you don't have to be the best wrestler to have a great match
Example: Punk and Cena had a 5 star match..... Cena....... He isn't awful but Cena has been in a 5 star match and Bryan has not.
I think many would agree with me that Bryan vs Rollins is more of a dream match than ambrose at this point.
'5 star match' is so subjective. You can't just go by what the Observer rates matches.