I don't think I'd separate Callaway from the Undertaker. I'd find a way to retire him as one thing.
Should they retire The Undertaker character or simply Mark Calloway?
- Thread starter seabs
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 6,691
- Reaction score
- 1,927
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 37
- Location
- Union City, Tennessee
I imagine a scenario similar to that one. Undertaker either wins or loses his last match at Wrestlemania, and then the next night, they do some sort of special effects shit (kinda like Royal Rumble 1994) that symbolizes Undertaker finally 'resting in peace' for good. Maybe he disappears into the air or he gets put in a casket and carried out or something imaginative along those lines. This would work better if he lost the streak considering it'd be the ultimate end for Taker, but I don't see that happening. Either way, once Taker retires this way, I don't think he should ever appear on WWE TV again (except for his eventual HOF induction), just to keep it up with the whole mystique of the Taker character.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 47,754
- Reaction score
- 14,050
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 33