2 hours? 3 words... GOD PLZ NO , as most said before, Ecw is just an onscreen developmental territory, it doesn't need much time for 5-6 storylines, it doesn't even have the roster to do so
should ecw be a 2-hour show?
- Thread starter joeyperez
- Start date
-
Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!
I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register
Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board
It shouldn't be a 2 hour for two reasons
1. Theirs not enough supertars on the roster
2. There no good Main Eventers
1. Theirs not enough supertars on the roster
2. There no good Main Eventers
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
- Messages
- 670
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
- Age
- 32
No. ECW is a glorified developmental territory and the WWE is good with what they have done with ECW right now, ECW doesn't need a 10-12 time on ECW, that would be stupid since some people would be asleep by then. Believe me 1 hour of WWECW is enough for me on one day.
There roster is to small to be able to hold up a decent 2 hour show, not to mention there doing very a good job as a one hour show and there's no need to put that at risk especially since it's the C show.
ECW only has what? 30 wrestlers on there roster? and they use about 15 of them? Whatever happened to Mike Knox i liked his style and the way he worked in the ring. He hasn't been on TV since D2D. So ECW needs to actually STOP being on TV and split the roster to RAW and SD.
the dark knight
Guest
No
why?
simple, not enough SUPERSTARS. and the title is pretty much a joke compared to the WHC or the WWE championship.
why?
simple, not enough SUPERSTARS. and the title is pretty much a joke compared to the WHC or the WWE championship.