SmackDown Live #SDLIVE thread, Aug. 21, 2018: Two huge matches headline a special edition in Brooklyn

[Smart Marx]

Naomi still exists. Good to know.

IIConics trashing Brooklyn makes me like them more.

 

[Deezy]

These thots gonna be talking from now on.....THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT DAVE!!@!

 

[Smart Marx]

So she's just suppose to do nothing? lol I mean alright if that's what you want then okay. But I rather have something that makes sense. It makes sense that if the bad guys keep on and on doing crap like this, you do something to STOP IT. Not just sit there doing NOTHING at all. That IMO makes you a bad GM that you just let heels get away with every single thing, THAT makes you a bad baby face GM. As then it seems you're fine with cheating and crap like that.

So tell me how two on two isn't even? I'll wait.

Again, I told you they are supposed to stop cheating WITHOUT showing babyface bias. I take it you've never seen a good babyface GM. There's been plenty that did what they're supposed to without showing clear bias for the good guys.

But to be fair, for proper storytelling, there should never be a babyface GM. It ruins the point of the story.

Wait, I literally just thought of the perfect one: William Regal is how you do it if you need to.

 

[Deezy]

Peyton Royce needs to lighten her forehead

 

[Hidden Blaze]

Again, I told you they are supposed to stop cheating WITHOUT showing babyface bias. I take it you've never seen a good babyface GM. There's been plenty that did what they're supposed to without showing clear bias for the good guys.

But to be fair, for proper storytelling, there should never be a babyface GM. It ruins the point of the story.

Wait, I literally just thought of the perfect one: William Regal is how you do it if you need to.

I mean I been watching wrestling since I was a kid so I seen plenty of them? I mean I can agree that baby face GMs are bad yeah, but I don't see how making a mixed tag is bias?? Two one one or three on two is bias, but two on two is well, not bias? As it means both teams have the same amount of people. I'm sure if a heel wanted a fair, two on two match they could get it....but heels would likely won't something that isn't fair.

 

[Deezy]

Nice perfectplex tho

 

[Cwalker]

Damn Naomi out here losing to Peyton Royce...

WM33 gotta seem like a lifetime ago

 

[Cwalker]

This smurf E man

 

[Smart Marx]

Did we need the close-up of Big E's chest?

 

[Cwalker]

The look of euphoria on E’s face every time someone says 5

 

[Apoho Creed]

Naomi hasn't looked good since WM lolz. Naomi I think you've been forgotten I heard NXT might need you.

 

[Smart Marx]

I mean I been watching wrestling since I was a kid so I seen plenty of them? I mean I can agree that baby face GMs are bad yeah, but I don't see how making a mixed tag is bias?? Two one one or three on two is bias, but two on two is well, not bias? As it means both teams have the same amount of people. I'm sure if a heel wanted a fair, two on two match they could get it....but heels would likely won't something that isn't fair.

I'm not talking about the mixed tag. I'm talking her clear and obvious bias she's had since getting the job. Just listen to the way she talks to heels. She does it every episode. You really can't miss it.

 

[Deezy]

Two women segments...might not get my Mandy fix.....THANKS ALOT DAVE

 

[Apoho Creed]

Two women segments...might not get my Mandy fix.....THANKS ALOT DAVE

Mandy is coming over though she's on her way. Don't forget to put your Birthday Suit on which is nothing.

 

[Cwalker]

Two women segments...might not get my Mandy fix.....THANKS ALOT DAVE

Forget that...

Where’s Asuka?