Ryback vs Ziggler?

[Crayo]

Or perhaps he understands it's logical booking.

 

[Cloud]

I missed Ryback - Ziggler but I am impressed with them making Ryback a beast.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

nets bury the best talent in WWE for the helluva it e='Crayo' pid='304909' dateline='1351268940']
Or perhaps he understands it's logical booking.
[/quote]
Yea dog totally logical let's bury the best talent in wwe for the helluva it

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Fucking phone. Cba to fix that shit

 

[Crayo]

Lol. It's not burying at all, Ryback is going to be one of the to stars for years to come. Ziggler has NO momentum, it doesn't make sense for Ryback to have a close fight with Ziggler when they're trying to make him seem like a serious challenge to Punk. As I said, if Ziggler HAD momentum and was booked strong before the fight with Ryback then I would be equally as mad at this booking.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

Sticking with Crayo with this. Ryback needed the longer match with a compelling opponent that made him look good. As much as I'd love to say "Shoulda protected Ziggler, throw Superstar X in this spot", there's no Superstar X that'll make him look as awesome as Ziggler did.

Their best sellers with no feuds atm are Ziggler and Baretta, and putting Trent Baretta in a ME of their brand new show is a terrible business decision lmao. Is it past time that Ziggler gets anything resembling credibility? Absolutely, but given up hope on Vince actually pushing this guy until he gets the belt, he's an idiot.

In other words you are also accepting the fact that WWE fucking sucks. "oh well they won't use ziggler right anyway" is piss poor reasoning

 

[Crayo]

Please actually combat the point I've made twice Dolph's.

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

What point? That Ziggler is already buried so why not bury him some more? GREAT POINT

 

[Rysenberg]

You again either missed or chose to ignore my point.

You accepting their shit has nothing to do with having realistic expectations of said shit

But why should I bother getting myself worked up for a good march when it's inevitably just gonna be a burial? As others have said, it would be Blue for Ziggler to randomly start doing well against the guy who they are trying to make look like a beast.

On mobile hencethe bad spelling

 

[Dolph'sZiggler]

But why should I bother getting myself worked up for a good march when it's inevitably just gonna be a burial? As others have said, it would be Blue for Ziggler to randomly start doing well against the guy who they are trying to make look like a beast.

On mobile hencethe bad spelling

It's not about getting 'worked up' it's just that you have been conditioned to roll with any bullshit wwe shoves down your throat.

 

[Rysenberg]

It's not about getting 'worked up' it's just that you have been conditioned to roll with any bullshit wwe shoves down your throat.

Nor at all. When it was Brodus for example I was absolutely furious, it was totally unnecessary and neither guy gained anything from it. However it made sense against a guy who's approaching his first ever main event - while Ziggler has nothing on at HiAc.

 

[Crayo]

What point? That Ziggler is already buried so why not bury him some more? GREAT POINT

Clearly not my point, I expect you to be able to comprehend it without any troubles, no need for me to post it thrice.

 

[Lackin]

Was I satisfied from what I saw? Well WWE is known for making MITB winners look like shit until their cash-in.

:TRUE:

 

[Snowman1]

In other words you are also accepting the fact that WWE fucking sucks. "oh well they won't use ziggler right anyway" is piss poor reasoning

They won't. Will they when he wins the belt? Maybe, we'll see.

For now, why can't you be happy that Ziggler's helping create the big babyface star WWE desperately needs right now? Even in the IWC and our "LOL vince pushing yet another green steroid" logic (which isn't even proven to be true), people seem happy they're getting something besides Cena/Punk yet again. Ziggler's time is coming.

This did way more good than bad.