Report on Who Will Induct Sting

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
383,775
Reaction score
155,570
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
- Sting, who was announced in June at Slammiversary as the inaugural inductee into the TNA Hall of Fame, will be inducted by retired wrestler and longtime friend Lex Luger, according to Busted Open.

Sting's formal induction will take place at Bound For Glory on October 14, 2012 at the Grand Canyon University Arena in Phoenix, Arizona.

Sting and Luger have been close friends dating back to the 1980s when both competed for Jim Crockett's World Championship Wrestling. Luger's last TNA appearance involved Sting as in September and October 2006, he and Buff Bagwell appeared on iMPACT! to help the wrestling legend prepare for his match against Jeff Jarrett at Bound For Glory.

I think this is a good choice, Luger and Sting have their fair share of history for sure.
 

Crippler

Prove me wrong
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
56,353
Reaction score
9,503
Points
115
Location
Hell's Club
Favorite Wrestler
chrisbenoit2
Yeah if Flair wasn't gonna do it i would have Luger do it.
 

Undertaker

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
150
Reaction score
4
Points
18
TNA could have named their version of the 'Hall of Fame' differently. It's just a cheap rip off of WWE's world renowned Hall of Fame. I guess with Sting being inducted into TNA's version that means any chance of him being inducted into WWE's is almost zero. For some reason I thought Christian was meant to be inducting Sting but I probably got mixed up with something to do with when he last appeared on TNA. I'm surprised TNA didn't take the liberty of copying WWE again and having a Hall of Fame show!
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
383,775
Reaction score
155,570
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
TNA could have named their version of the 'Hall of Fame' differently. It's just a cheap rip off of WWE's world renowned Hall of Fame. I guess with Sting being inducted into TNA's version that means any chance of him being inducted into WWE's is almost zero. For some reason I thought Christian was meant to be inducting Sting but I probably got mixed up with something to do with when he last appeared on TNA. I'm surprised TNA didn't take the liberty of copying WWE again and having a Hall of Fame show!

Multiple problems with your post. a) WWE's HOF isn't world renowned. b) What could TNA have named it instead of "Hall of Fame" which every other sport also names theirs. c) There's still a good chance for Sting to be inducted to the WWE one once he leaves TNA, WWE always has a lot of Sting stuff up on their website. d) WWE copies TNA too, this past Raw, they allowed you to watch the matches during commercial breaks on WWE.com, something TNA has been doing ever since the start of the summer, which has been enjoyable.
 

Crippler

Prove me wrong
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
56,353
Reaction score
9,503
Points
115
Location
Hell's Club
Favorite Wrestler
chrisbenoit2
"Hall Of Action" or "Total Non-Stop Fame" :hm:
 

Undertaker

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
150
Reaction score
4
Points
18
Multiple problems with your post.
No. Multiple opinions.

a) WWE's HOF isn't world renowned.
Yes, it is. When international media, for example, cover news stories about WWE Hall of Famers they almost always mention the Hall of Fame.

Example from IGN.com: During a scary live-TV ordeal, WWE Hall of Famer Jerry Lawler gets stretchered out of the arena and taken to a nearby hospital for emergency treatment.

b) What could TNA have named it instead of "Hall of Fame" which every other sport also names theirs.
Hall of Shame?

c) There's still a good chance for Sting to be inducted to the WWE one once he leaves TNA, WWE always has a lot of Sting stuff up on their website.
I highly doubt it but there again funnier things have happened.

d) WWE copies TNA too, this past Raw, they allowed you to watch the matches during commercial breaks on WWE.com, something TNA has been doing ever since the start of the summer, which has been enjoyable.
I would disagree on the enjoyment point. It must get rather annoying having to switch between a television and a computer if your desperate enough to watch 3 full hours of PG nonsense.
 

Chris

Dreams are Endless
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
383,775
Reaction score
155,570
Points
128
Age
28
Location
Texas
Favorite Wrestler
tLCb5kv
Favorite Wrestler
OEndG4L
Favorite Wrestler
ArsUxsj
Favorite Wrestler
mrperfect2
Favorite Wrestler
eelOIL6
Favorite Wrestler
BryanDanielson1
Favorite Sports Team
sfa
Favorite Sports Team
dallascowboys
Favorite Sports Team
sanantoniospurs
Favorite Sports Team
texasrangers
I would disagree on the enjoyment point. It must get rather annoying having to switch between a television and a computer if your desperate enough to watch 3 full hours of PG nonsense.

I was referring to it being enjoyable for TNA, this was the first time Raw did it and I haven't seen any feedback on it. Your "PG nonsense" line says a lot about what kind of fan you are though.
 

EffectsofRaven

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2011
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
44
Points
48
PG Nonsesne lol....

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear... I agree with Chris though, there's many things incorrect with your opinions.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Nothing really incorrect with opinions since they are opinions and not facts, you can disagree with them but they can't be incorrect.

It is the best choice now that TNA has nothing to do with Flair, what kind of shape is Luger in though because I seem to remember him being wheelchair bound.
 

Keith

WCW Halloween Phantom
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,933
Reaction score
3,294
Points
113
Fair choice I say given the history. Question is will TNA's version of the Hall of Fame actually induct TNA home grown names in the future. I get that a wrestling Hall of Fame should represent all of wrestling but given the limited access of names that TNA has acess to then maybe they should look more to their own talent, such as Styles, Daniels, Joe etc.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
But Styles, Daniels and Joe should all be years away from HOF inductions. You can't induct an active full time wrestler, it just doesn't make any sense to do it. It should be a recognition for guys that are now retired or only appearing every once in a while. I think that Jeff Jarrett should be next simply because without him there would be no TNA and then maybe the year after Angle will finally be retired so they can add him.
 

Keith

WCW Halloween Phantom
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,933
Reaction score
3,294
Points
113
But Styles, Daniels and Joe should all be years away from HOF inductions. You can't induct an active full time wrestler, it just doesn't make any sense to do it. It should be a recognition for guys that are now retired or only appearing every once in a while. I think that Jeff Jarrett should be next simply because without him there would be no TNA and then maybe the year after Angle will finally be retired so they can add him.

Fair point I just didn't know if TNA had enough wrestlers who fit that bill so didn't know if it might not be best to make it a TNA themed HOF. Then again if it is just one per year that could work.
 

Troy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
23,057
Reaction score
72
Points
48
Location
Streets Ahead
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
Favorite Wrestler
wherestroy
I think that they have to go with one per year because they don't have enough history yet. They have been around for ten years and so it is too soon for a HOF. Keep going with the one per year concept until a few more stars retire and then they can gradually expand it to two or three a year.
 

Big Red Jericho Punk

Active Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
2,678
Reaction score
21
Points
38
Wait if Luger is inducting him, then what is Christian CAGE going to do at BFG. I want to hear that theme music one more time.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
365
Reaction score
10
Points
18
Location
7six5
Favorite Wrestler
deanambrose
Favorite Wrestler
sethrollins
Favorite Wrestler
romanreigns
Favorite Wrestler
themiz
Favorite Wrestler
braywyatt
Favorite Wrestler
paulheyman
I heard that Christian was to induct him, but that damn clause in his WWE contract would prevent him from
going anywhere near a TNA event.

Since TNA has only been around for 10 years, they really wouldn't have a lot of options as far as home grown
wrestlers go. They'll probably do wrestlers that have been big names in TNA in the past. Examples could
include Kevin Nash, Scott Hall, Raven, etc.