- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 56,353
- Reaction score
- 9,504
- Points
- 115
- Location
- Hell's Club
- Favorite Wrestler
-
Edge didn't become a legit draw until 2008 when he was controlling smackdown.....guess how old he was?That's fine but don't bring up someone that doesn't fit the argument if you don't know the facts like you did with Hunter.
And Edge and Hulk Hogan also don't fit into that argument either. Both in their early thirties when they started drawing.
Once AGAIN, not my post, not my argument. I didn't say it.
And yes, yes absolutely really. 31 is closer to 35 than it is 25. Don't be silly.
Edge didn't become a legit draw until 2008 when he was controlling smackdown.....guess how old he was?
Wrestlemania 3 was headlined by a 35 year old Hulkster.![]()
Confusing push....with draw.It's still 31 though. If the argument is "someone started drawing at 35" but they started at 31 then the argument is invalid.
Confusing push....with draw.
05? No he wasn't.But hulk started drawing 3 years prior and edge was drawing starting in 2005
05? No he wasn't.
He finally became a drawing heel champ when he had Vickie with him.
Wasn't even the focal point of Wrestlemania 2000, wasn't even the focal point of fucking Backlash the month later.You telling me Hunter didn't draw until 2004?
The argument was Brian Kendrick shouldn't be considered out because most people don't draw until their thirties. Trying to tie a single year on that is stupid. 31 still isn't 25 like most of these guys getting pushes today.It's still 31 though. If the argument is "someone started drawing at 35" but they started at 31 then the argument is invalid.
Wasn't even the focal point of Wrestlemania 2000, wasn't even the focal point of fucking Backlash the month later.
Figure it out.