Rate The Wrestlemania's!

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


Montana

Guest
7.5/10

As i've seen in the past, great undercard, lackluster main events. WM is remembered by main events.
 

C4

Guest
The whole "Hollywood" concept was pretty damn cool and Stone Cold returning for Pipers Pit felt huge also the commercial advertisements :w00t: Hulk Hogan had been inducted into the Hall of Fame the night before and the whole segment with Eugene and Muhammad Hassan was historic.

I really loved this WrestleMania and it was definitely better than 22, 23 and 24. Yes, it was indeed better than all of them :shifty: The card was fantastic no doubt about it, first ever Money in the Bank, Cena and Batista in their first major matches of WrestleMania, such good and well set storylines for the main events with the break-up of evolution and everything else, Undertaker vs. Orton, Pipers Pit, Hogans segment, Kurt Angle and Michaels was a wrestling clinic.

Everything was set perfectly, 9/10.
 

Evil Austin

Guest
It was actually a good mania both world champions changed hands which is a good thing shook things up and made it interesting. I liked it.
 

TheAnswer

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
557
Reaction score
0
Points
16
Age
44
I didnt like this Mania. After I left my friends house from watching it, I thought it was pretty garbage, but after awhile I thought about it and liked it a little more.

I'll give it a 7/10 just because of the Orton vs Taker and Michaels vs Angle. The reason it was disappointing is because the main events sucked. However those two matches were terrific.