RATE RAW 6/17

  • Welcome to "The New" Wrestling Smarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


McLovin1

The Artiste
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
809
Reaction score
135
Points
0
Age
34
i'll give it 4/10
+ for Henry even if i saw it coming from a mile away
+ for Ziggler attacking del rio
+ for Punk and Lesnar
+ for the McMahons feud
the rest was just typical raw crap.
 

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
YES Henry's promo may well be the best of the year so far but it isn't enough to give the whole show 10/10 :pity1:


Still can't believe you gave it a 4/10!? Typical Raw crap is 2hrs of meaningless crap with a couple of decent segments or matches, every segment besides Sheamus/Rhodes Scholars was worth watching and felt necessary for me. I didn't give it a 10/10 for Henry, I just felt I'd mention him as he was, by far, the stand out of the show IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayo

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
Still can't believe you gave it a 4/10!? Typical Raw crap is 2hrs of meaningless crap with a couple of decent segments or matches, every segment besides Sheamus/Rhodes Scholars was worth watching and felt necessary for me. I didn't give it a 10/10 for Henry, I just felt I'd mention him as he was, by far, the stand out of the show IMO.

They went over Sheamus. That was worth watching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rysenberg

McLovin1

The Artiste
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
809
Reaction score
135
Points
0
Age
34
Still can't believe you gave it a 4/10!? Typical Raw crap is 2hrs of meaningless crap with a couple of decent segments or matches, every segment besides Sheamus/Rhodes Scholars was worth watching and felt necessary for me. I didn't give it a 10/10 for Henry, I just felt I'd mention him as he was, by far, the stand out of the show IMO.
if Cesaro/Regal Cara/axel Jericho/Slater and the AJ crap were worth watching in your opinion then i guess it is normal that you gave it 10/10
 
  • Like
Reactions: Testify

Rysenberg

Legend
Joined
Mar 4, 2012
Messages
10,893
Reaction score
1,241
Points
0
Location
United Scotland of Ambrose
if Cesaro/Regal Cara/axel Jericho/Slater and the AJ crap were worth watching in your opinion then i guess it is normal that you gave it 10/10

If Henry's promo of the year, Lesnar's return, Punk/Del Rio's match, D-Bry/Randy's match, Ziggler's awesome attack, the McMahon's segments including one with the Shield and a really solid opening promo weren't worth watching in your opinion then I guess it is normal that you gave it a 4/10.

+ Christian returning as well
 

McLovin1

The Artiste
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
809
Reaction score
135
Points
0
Age
34
That accumulates -6 points for you, where as ALL the other good stuff makes 4? Lol.

I didn't really count the points lol .
4/10= Overall crappy show with some good moments
 

Crayo

The Boss
Joined
Dec 16, 2011
Messages
63,815
Reaction score
6,080
Points
1
Location
United Kingdom of Ambrose
Website
wweforums.net
56c63760ac97f8b1bf2a0a83d2fafd92.gif
 

McLovin1

The Artiste
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
809
Reaction score
135
Points
0
Age
34
i just saw the nipple slip :fap: so i guess i'll give it 7/10:win: