I however, will ruin the fun for you (nobody post after
RaSnowman or else this won't work). Anyway, to give it away early so anyone who doesn't want to here a contrary negative opinion can just scroll down way past this thesis because I did not like this show. I liked about four things from it. After Payback got the highest score of any PPV I reviewed on here, Backlash will receive the lowest. Well, probably not cause WrestleMania 29 happened, and Night of Champions from that year was dreadful too. Also should note I watched this Sunday and didn't take any notes, some my memory on a few matches are noticeable foggy.
Backlash Review
The Debut of Kneekamura
For me, the biggest surprise of the night was the position of Shinsuke's match. There was also the lingering doubt about Orton retaining in the main event, and aside from that match I got pretty much all the results right, aside from Zayn/Corbin and technically the six women's tag since I didn't care enough to even think about who would win there, but them debuting Shinsuke in the curtain jerker? Unthinkable. Now granted, if anyone besides AJ Styles was going to get the crowd riled up and set a good tone for the rest of the night, it was probably Shinsuke. The dude's way over so I just naturally assumed that his debut, in order to give an extra air of importance, would place in the upper echelon of the card. Not main event but certainly above who cares Harper/Rowan.
That aside, the match itself was . . . dull. Like, it accomplished what it needed to I guess but I was bored for long stretches of this bout. I understand that they were aiming to get across Shinsuke's as a resilient bad-ass but did we really need for Dolph to dominate for long stretches of the matches with slow offense. And most of the time Shinsuke did mount offense he just did knee strikes. There were some great moments, I loved the sequence leading to the Zig Zag, the super-kick to the back of the head, and the finish sequence was great but otherwise, this was a pretty un-engaging affair from me.
Match Rating: 5/10
I Don't Even Care That Breeze Wasn't Disqualified When He Clearly Should've Been
This match, probably should've annoyed me. I can tend to be a bit of curmudgeon and wacky antics like this should be right up my wheel-barrel to hate but nope, this was the first thing on the show that I liked. Granted, I immediately disregarded them as potential threats to the tag team championships and the rolling away from Uso A gag lasted a bit too long but the rest, this worked for me. Particularly the janitor/mop part, they got some pretty good spots from that mop. Since I actually liked this, I'm trying to think of what to talk about but it pretty much speaks for itself. It was more Looney Tunes than a Championship bout, but as a one-off show case for two funny and capable workers, it worked. Thumbs up for the Fashion PoPo Breezango.
Match Rating: 7/10
What Does Sami Zayn's Tights Say, I Caught "to Resist Despair" But That's About All, At Least That I Remember. Makes me think of Danganronpa. That's Probably Unintentional, Danganronpa Just Said "Despair" a Lot, or "Zetsubou" In The Original Japanese. I Don't Think Sami's a Weeb But I Never Looked Into So Maybe. Either Way, I Was More Invested In Sami's Tights Than The Match Itself, Interpret That However You Want
This felt like a Smackdown Live match rather than a PPV bout. Most of this PPV did.
Match Rating: 5/10
Better Call Becky With The Good Hair
Becky's weird 80's Lesbian Mad Max hair style was the second thing I liked about this PPV. It never ceased to amuse me, I don't know what made Becky to decide to sport weird hair for all her PPV matches, but I hope it never stops. As for the match, well I said earlier I didn't even care to think about who would win, and despite being a fan of everyone involved, even James Ellsworth, this didn't change my opinion. I don't even remember the match, when Natayla said on Smackdown she won for team, I didn't have any recollection of it. I had to look it up on Wikipedia, the most trust worthy source, that Natalya did in fact win for her team, and by making Lynch tap out! This match is the quintessential forgettable 6-tag match you book on the go-home show because you can't think of anything else to build to the PPV bouts, not the PPV bout itself. The women, the wrestlers, deserve better than this, how dare you. Maybe this wouldn't have felt like such an episode of Smackdown Live to me if you put the Championship on the line.
Also, just on a complete tangential note, Tamina should not be a part of The Welcoming Committee. She's been there just as long as Charlotte has, she shouldn't be in charge of introducing someone to a brand that she herself is unfamiliar with. "Hey, I just moved in the house next door from another state, let me show you around the neighborhood". The stupidity of The Welcoming Committee's name can not be understated, I'm glad it's a one-off thing too, because you continue to welcome someone.
Match Rating: 3/10
Third Thing I Liked
To be honest though, even this disappointed a little. Part of this is because I have probably unreasonable expectations for AJ Styles but the added pressure from the rest of the show mostly disappointing only heighten my desire from him and Owens to kill it. They didn't have the match of the year candidate I was hoping for but they easily had match of the night. I loved the story with AJ's bad leg, and I even loved the finish. It was such a unique way to get a count-out result, and personally that salvaged it from being a disappointing finish. I recall being captivated from the Pumphandle Neckbreaker onward. Once again, AJ Styles steals the show.
Match Rating: 8/10
Who Cares Harper/Rowan
I want to postface that title by stating that I actually really like Luke Harper. I consider him to be the best big man wrestler in the WWE today even. He's really talented but I just don't care about this feud with Rowan, and I really hope he develops a personality following this encounter. But despite the fact that I didn't care going in, I actually thought this was fine. I wouldn't say I liked it or anything, but I expected worse.
Match Rating: 5/10
The WWE Champion Has Only Won 17.66% Out of 450+ Matches
Just for reference, Vince McMahon has a higher winning percentage than Jinder Mahal (46.77% if you're interested, and yes, that is baffling), meaning that, Jinder has the worst record of any WWE Champion if I'm not mistaken. Granted, he works way more matches than Vince, but that is something that just looks awful. Can't even win 20% of his matches yet he's the top guy of the company. But, I'll be honest, that doesn't really bother me. That's not why I'm not pleased with Jinder's Championship win. I'm bothered for two reasons, one of which is semi-connected to his record.
That being that WWE didn't properly play up that angle of the feud. Look, if you want to turn someone from a jobber to WWE Champion in about a month's time, fine. But you can't suddenly turn someone from a jobber to a main event status without seriously commenting on the recent change in ability. Of course, the reason is the Singh Siblings. Jinder's pretty much only won any match, that I recall anyway, because those two interfered. This is a fine foundation but that's unfortunately all it is. Now, maybe it's because I just watch the youtube clips so feel free to correct me but as far as I can tell, Orton's addressed it once stating that "From where I'm from, you have to win to become Champion" and the sparingly bring up on commentary that a month ago Jinder would be nowhere near the belt or something, and that Smackdown Live really is the Land of Opportunity. Generally speaking, when it's mentioned on commentary, it's framed as a New York Minute by Don Henley type of thing and a way to develop Smackdown Live's favorite slogan. Commentators are there, in WWE, to express the story of the feud/match to the audience. They're specifically feed lines so the message Vince or whoever wants is conveyed to the audience. So, when they chose to gloss over Jinder's meteoric rise to prominence, it's clear that they want you to ignore that too. To throw out any semblance of proper storyline in lieu of just promoting Smackdown Live's moniker. And I get why they do this. If you're pushing him because you want to ignite the Indian market, you don't want to constantly bombard them with information that prior to this, Jinder was nothing but a joke. So instead, they have Jinder regurgitate Muhammad Hassan lines because Jingoism is one of the easiest methods of getting heel heat, just ask Slaughter. And look, it works. Even though Jinder's earlier promo in the night was one of the only times I actually thought a wrestler deserved the "What" chants because dear lord the script and delivery, but especially the script, was abysmal. But whatever, it seems to work, I'm not knocking the practice. I just wish they incorporate that along with his rise. Have Jinder be that character, further emphasize the Singhers role in his music success, all while the commentary and others hammer in the point that he's only a winner because of outside interference. Make the distinction between Jinder using two guys to win from when say Edge did it. Because the nuance of a former loser heel and an established winning heel using is an important distinction that can make different compelling angles. This can even be used to gradual develop Jinder as a winning on his own. As his run with the Singhs progresses, they start becoming less and less integral to his victory. By the time he wins the belt, he still needs them quite a bit but eventually they'll just come in towards the finish, then have a scenario where he's forced to defend without them. Have them banned from ringside and during that match, you can establish just how much he's grown in a natural way. I don't think he'd have to win clean necessarily but you can solidify him as a top heel there even if he still has to cheat to win because he can stand on his own. My point being, you can craft an engaging narrative using his history as a jobber but WWE isn't interested in logical story-telling and would rather skip to the top spot. And yes, he's generating heat and reactions but I'd argue they'd be even bigger if you increased focus on his record prior to it. And then, this would feel like a natural progression. Instead, it feels like WWE made a business decision. We all know Jinder won because of the Indian market, and we all know that's what WWE cares about since the commentators bring up his non-Canadian origins all the time.
The second problem for me is that Jinder just hasn't worked for me. I thought his initial promo after winning or whatever was great. But since then, he's promos have been a generic bore often delivered poorly, and his matches have been average at best. I don't necessarily blame this on him, well not the promos anyway. His physique is great and I like his finisher, and there are plenty who are digging him but I just can't see it. Like for example, this match I'm suppose to be talking about? Well, why do you think I'm only talking about Jinder winning the WWE Championship? Because that's literally the only thing worth talking about, outside of that awesome backdrop on the table with the equally awesome Orton face (fourth thing I liked) because my god, was the match a bore. The opening minutes and the closing minutes were fine but the entire middle of the match almost put me to sleep. I was tired already so I thought maybe it wasn't really their fault but after Backlash I watched two matches from the recent Takeover because what is sleep and I felt wide awake during both Dunne/Bates and Asuka/NonAsuka's. So yeah, I'm not giving the match the benefit of the doubt here. Ultimately it was a really boring match capped off with a Championship change that felt like nothing more than a cheap business tactic with minimum effort put into it. If you can get more out of Jinder, and trust me I enjoy saying don't Hinder Jinder a lot but that's not enough for me, then that's great. But for me, it's a low-point.
Match Rating: 3/10
PPV Rating: 5.1/10
Rankings
PPV's
I. Payback ~ 6.4/10
II. WrestleMania 33 ~ 6.1/10
III. Backlash ~ 5.1/10
Matches
I. WWE Title, John Cena vs. AJ Styles (c): Royal Rumble ~ 10/10
II. WWE Title, Bray Wyatt vs. AJ Styles vs. The Miz vs. Dean Ambrose vs. Baron Corbin vs. John Cena (c), Elimination Chamber: Elimination Chamber ~ 9/10
III. Raw Tag Team Titles, Sheamus & Cesaro vs. The Hardy Boyz (c): Payback ~ 8/10
IV. CW Title, Austin Aries vs. Neville (c): Payback ~ 8/10
V. Raw Women's Title, Alexa Bliss vs. Bayley (c): Payback ~ 8/10
VI. Raw Women's Title, Charlotte Flair vs. Sasha Banks vs. Nia Jax vs. Bayley (c): WrestleMania 33 ~ 8/10
VII. Universal Title, Brock Lesnar vs. Goldberg (c): WrestleMania 33 ~ 8/10
VIII. AJ Styles vs. Shane McMahon: WrestleMania 33 ~ 8/10
IX. CW Title, Jack Gallagher vs. Neville (c): Fastlane ~ 8/10
X. US Title, AJ Styles vs. Kevin Owens (c): Backlash ~ 8/10
Okay, there were a few more PPV's that I scored lower than Backlash on here, 2013's Royal Rumble, Survivor Series, & TLC all did worse. Still, not what I consider a good score but honestly, higher than what I'd score it just off the top of my head (a 4 if you're curious). Like I've said before, my rating system isn't weighted at all, one really bad five minute squash has the same weight as twenty minute classic. And if you're wondering, "Hey, if you saw Dunne v. Bates at Takeover, why the fuck is it not in you're top ten matches?". Well, to answer that rhetorical question, I'm planning on watching the event in full early June and doing a review then. Will be fun to be able to praise matches after this debacle, and from what I hear, that event will break my highest score record. Looking forward to it.