Quadrant 2 Final

[The New F'n Show]

Triple H

Undertaker

 

[The Wrestling Addict]

Taker may be a good heel but when it comes to being a heel, The Game is just that damn good!

 

[Slim]

There is nothing in wrestling more heel than the Ministry of Darkness Undertaker

 

[The New F'n Show]

While, Ministry of Darkness Taker may be the greatest Heel run ever, it just didn't last long enough. On Overall Career as a Hell I'm going Trips. Cerebral Assassin gimmick really worked.

 

[Troy]

Triple H gets my vote. His best work by far is as a heel and he was a top heel for much longer than taker.

 

[Heisenberg]

Taker was a good heel but was a better face, I didn't think his heel run was good when you compare him to Triple H.

 

[The Cork]

He might be a legend but Taker isn't a great heel or babyface, pretty hard to vote for a guy who has barely spoke throughout a 20 year career.

Trips circa 2000 is probably my favourite heel ever.

 

[Doink]

Going with Slim here, Ministry of Darkness Taker was probably my favourite heel run of all time.

 

[Slim]

Triple H has played the exact same character since 2000, only talking less. Undertaker's character has evolved as a heel dominating in his early days to a face. Then slowly turned back into a heel where he took out McMahon, to Ministry of Darkness which was the epitome of what a heel can be. From there he returned as a face with the ABA and from there turned back heel with the whole Big Evil. Its like Undertaker changes the heel.

Triple H has not changed anything. Trips has been the same for the past decade. Not to take away from his heel run but really... Taker brought something different with his different heel runs. Triple H... whether face or heel played the exact same thing ever since he became "The Game." Taker should be leading now.

 

[Smartmark]

Taker gets my vote

 

[PHX]

Triple H has played the exact same character since 2000, only talking less. Undertaker's character has evolved as a heel dominating in his early days to a face. Then slowly turned back into a heel where he took out McMahon, to Ministry of Darkness which was the epitome of what a heel can be. From there he returned as a face with the ABA and from there turned back heel with the whole Big Evil. Its like Undertaker changes the heel.

Triple H has not changed anything. Trips has been the same for the past decade. Not to take away from his heel run but really... Taker brought something different with his different heel runs. Triple H... whether face or heel played the exact same thing ever since he became "The Game." Taker should be leading now.

Can't agree with that because there is a big change in Triple H from 2000 to 2003 when he kind of brought a little bit of the Hunter Hearst Hemsley character back and mixed it with the Game character. I will agree that Taker evolved more in his heel characters for sure but think you're discrediting Trips here a little bit.

But anyways went with Triple H, should be in the finals depending.

 

[Canadian Pothead]

Went with Triple H, but barely.

 

[chefboyardee]

hunter,not even close in my book,i view taker as a face.

 

[Keith]

Triple H.

 

[Kiffy Lube]

Triple H, of course. Taker shouldn't have gone this far anyways as far I'm concerned.