MikeRaw
Guest
Alright, I was thinking about this today.
Often times, as wrestling fans, we want alot of things. But one of the things we want is a good, solid tag team division, that we can care about.
But another thing we always want, is new stars, and new main eventers, and people being pushed.
But sometimes, you need to choose. An example of this is Lance Cade, and another is John Morrison, and hell, even Brian Kendrick. but it's not JUST these guys, so dont think that. Anyways, see, all these guys have been in tag teams before, and when they were, they were in the best tag team in wwe at that time. Now alot of us wanted them pushed as a tag team back then, and thinking hoo they should be the top team's in WWE. But all these guys, and many others, have eventually been broken away from their team.
Now, my point is, what comes first to you? If you have a guy who could be a top tag team star if pushed right, but teres also talk of pushing him as a singles guy, and trying to make him big, which do you want? Take Cade for example, if he stayed with Murdoch, they couldve been a top team for years more, and now, he's a single's guy, and they want to push him, but there's no guarantees.
So in cases like this, what do you think the priorities should be? Keep them in tag team where they have a good chance to shine as a team, or take a risk, and hope to make a new star, even if it menas sacrificing part of the struggline tag division...
Often times, as wrestling fans, we want alot of things. But one of the things we want is a good, solid tag team division, that we can care about.
But another thing we always want, is new stars, and new main eventers, and people being pushed.
But sometimes, you need to choose. An example of this is Lance Cade, and another is John Morrison, and hell, even Brian Kendrick. but it's not JUST these guys, so dont think that. Anyways, see, all these guys have been in tag teams before, and when they were, they were in the best tag team in wwe at that time. Now alot of us wanted them pushed as a tag team back then, and thinking hoo they should be the top team's in WWE. But all these guys, and many others, have eventually been broken away from their team.
Now, my point is, what comes first to you? If you have a guy who could be a top tag team star if pushed right, but teres also talk of pushing him as a singles guy, and trying to make him big, which do you want? Take Cade for example, if he stayed with Murdoch, they couldve been a top team for years more, and now, he's a single's guy, and they want to push him, but there's no guarantees.
So in cases like this, what do you think the priorities should be? Keep them in tag team where they have a good chance to shine as a team, or take a risk, and hope to make a new star, even if it menas sacrificing part of the struggline tag division...
